Abstract

The splintering of regulation has become a major problem for local government administration, especially where multiple government agencies issue overlapping regulations, reporting formats and administrative standards for the management of civil servants. This paper presents a qualitative case study of Surabaya, Indonesia, that investigates how regulatory fragmentation impacts managerial flexibility in civil service governance. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews with 21 informants, observations and document analysis. The data were analysed using thematic analysis, with NVivo 14 software. These findings suggest that the high compliance costs generated by fragmentation in ministerial regulations necessitate managerial discretion and adaptive responses from public managers. These responses are expressed in compliance, adaptation and innovation. Compliance is understood as adherence to several regulatory requirements, adaptation as harmonization of procedures, intensive coordination mechanisms and recurrent monitoring activities, and innovation as implementation of the E-ABK system to support the processes of job analysis and workload analysis. The study also points out challenges such as competency gaps, reliance on taskforce personnel and institutional sustainability that can affect the long-term effectiveness of adaptive governance practices. Our study contributes to the literature on public administration by showing that regulatory fragmentation not only generates administrative burdens but also transforms managerial discretion and promotes adaptive coordination as a key mechanism of civil service governance. These findings reveal how local governments preserve governance capacity, administrative standardization, and organizational efficiency under complex regulatory circumstances.

Keywords

Flexibility, Public Sector Management, Job Analysis, Workload Analysis, Civil Service Governance, Public Administration, Mechanism of Civil Service Governance,

References

  1. Abdelzaher, A.A., Kharbeche, M. (2022). New Simulation Model for Workload Analysis Addressing Occupational Stress in a Production Company. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 2005–2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.002
  2. Aguado-Riveros, U.I., Espinoza-Quispe, L.E., Santillán-Enciso, C.L., Silva-Infantes, M., Barrionuevo-Inca-Roca, Y.A., Astuñaupa-Flores, S.N., Poma-Lagos, L.A., Navarro-Véliz, J.A., González-Prida, V. (2026). Reducing Administrative Burden through Simplification and Document Management in Local Governments: Evidence from a District-Level Public Organization. Societies, 16(3), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16030091
  3. Aguero, R.D.L.R. (2026). Complexity in Service Provision: Unpacking Administrative Capacity to Understand Differential Performance. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70062
  4. Aleksandr, G., Lana, L. (2023). Metamorphosis of the Public Administration Paradigm and the New Qualification Profile of Civil Servants. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological, and Economic Science, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.21603/2500-3372-2023-8-3-323-333
  5. Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 23(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
  6. Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2023). Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses. Public Administration, 101(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12874
  7. Arsad, M., Noor, I., Hidayati, F. (2025). Unraveling Policy Overlaps in Indonesia’s National Development Planning System. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 6(3), https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v6i3.907
  8. Barbera, C., Sicilia, M., Steccolini, I. (2024). New development: Rethinking public sector accounting systems by rediscovering their relational nature. Public Money & Management, 44(8), 727–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2370550
  9. Barodi, M., Lalaoui, S. (2025). Civil servants readiness for AI adoption: The role of change management in Morocco’s public sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(1), 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.05
  10. Bouckaert, G., Peters, B.G., Verhoest, K. (2010). Coordination of public sector organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275256
  11. Branderhorst, E.M., Ruijer, E. (2025). Digital leadership in local government: an empirical study of Dutch city managers. Local Government Studies, 51(3), 576–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2363368
  12. Budi, A.S., Dinata, C., Putra, I.M.A.W.W., De La Peña, R.F. (2026). Global Currents of Public Management Reform: OECD Trends and Their Adaptation in Indonesian Governance. Journal of Transformative Governance and Social Justice, 4(1), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.26905/j-tragos.v4i1.16731
  13. Camacho, A.E., McLachlan, J.S. (2021). Regulatory fragmentation: An unexamined barrier to species conservation under climate change. Frontiers in Climate, 3, 735608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.735608
  14. Campbell, J.W., Northcott, E., Pandey, S.K. (2025). Policy implementation as social justice: a realist review of administrative burden research. Public Management Review, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2527315
  15. Capano, G., Howlett, M. (2024). Calibration and specification in policy practice: Micro-dimensions of policy design. Policy Design and Practice, 7(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2024.2353929
  16. Cappelletti, C., Diego, V., Mara, S. (2023). Human Resource Management (Human Resource Planning). Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal, 1(1), 49–60.
  17. Carstensen, M.B., Sørensen, E., Torfing, J. (2023). Why we need bricoleurs to foster robust governance solutions in turbulent times. Public Administration, 101(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12857
  18. Cervantes, D.E.T., Sahagún, B.A.V., Cortázar, A.L.G.d. (2022). Towards flexible evaluation schemes in areas with lacking information: A case of waste governance in Mexico. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), 1228–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211017970
  19. Chol, B.D., Chen, Z., Ayuel, N.K. (2026). Behavioral public administration in the public sector: A systematic review. Chinese Public Administration Review, 17(2), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251358458
  20. Christensen, T., Lægreid, P. (2025). Future directions of public administration research—Addressing fundamental issues and questions. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(5-6), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2470006
  21. Criado, J.I., Jimenez, C., Alcaide-Munoz, L. (2021). Open data portals development in city councils. An empirical analysis based on structural factors in Spain. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463737
  22. Ganesh, S.K.G., Vaishnavi, G., Rajayogan, K. (2022). A Methodical Approach to Job Analysis in a Typical Indian Manufacturing Organization. International Journal on Recent Trends in Business and Tourism, 6(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.31674/ijrtbt.2022.v06i02.002
  23. Guy, M.E., Mastracci, S. (2023). Where theory and practice meet: Good government, merit-based civil service, and HRM courses. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 29(3), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2023.2181624
  24. Hashmi, M.U., Shuja, S. (2020). The Bureucracy of Pakistan: From the Perspective of Max Weber’s Iron Cage Philosophy. Gomal University Journal of Research, 36(1), 30–39.
  25. Head, B.W., Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
  26. Heaton, S., Teece, D., Agronin, E. (2023). Dynamic capabilities and governance: An empirical investigation of financial performance of the higher education sector. Strategic Management Journal, 44(2), 520–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3444
  27. Holzer, M. (2022). Public administration at a crossroad: Five enduring challenges. Chinese Public Administration Review, 13(3), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754221110591
  28. Shubina, S., Miroshnyk, O. Yu., Rudenko, A., Karapetyan, R., Shevchuk, D. (2021). Financial Reporting As Part of the System of Information Supply of Modern Enterprise Management. Financial and Credit Systems: Prospects for Development, 2(2), 16-24. https://doi.org/10.26565/2786-4995-2021-2-02
  29. Inegbedion, H., Inegbedion, E., Peter, A., Harry, L. (2020). Heliyon Perception of workload balance and employee job satisfaction in work organisations. Heliyon, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03160
  30. Kalmenovitz, J., Lowry, M., Volkova, E. (2025). Regulatory fragmentation. The Journal of Finance, 80(2), 1081–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13423
  31. Kettl, D.F. (2020). Politics of the Administrative Process. CQ Press.
  32. Kuoppakangas, P., Suomi, K., Stenvall, J., Pekkola, E., Kivistö, J., Kallio, T. (2019). Revisiting the five problems of public sector organisations and reputation management-the perspective of higher education practitioners and ex-academics. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 16(2-4), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-019-00223-5
  33. Lægreid, P., Rykkja, L.H. (2022). Accountability and inter-organizational collaboration within the state. Public Management Review, 24(5), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1963822
  34. Lenz, A. (2024). Managing crises as if no one is watching? Governance dilemmas from a public perspective. Public Administration, 102(4), 1397–1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12980
  35. Levi-Faur, D. ed. (2012). The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press.
  36. Li, J. (2025). Governing high-risk technologies in a fragmented world: Geopolitical tensions, regulatory gaps, and institutional barriers to global cooperation. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-025-00445-4
  37. Lodge, M., Wegrich, K. (2012). Managing regulation: Regulatory analysis, politics and policy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  38. Lyrio, M.V.L., Lunkes, R.J., Vasarhelyi, M. (2025). Emerging & data technologies applied to public sector: An AI-copiloted systematic literature review. Contabilidad y Negocios, 20(40), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.18800/contabilidad.202502.003
  39. Malaj, A., Culani, A. (2023). Human Resource Management Is an Important Part of the Management Process. European Journal of Business and Management, 15(11), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/15-11-03
  40. Mobolade, G.O., Akinade, M.E. (2021). Team Building and Teamwork in Organizations: Implications to Managers and Employees in Work Places. International Journal of Management, Social Science, Peace and Conflict Studies, 4(1), 261–274.
  41. Moore, M.H. (2022). Public Value Creation: The Essence of Strategic Management in Public Administration. Environmental, Social, Government, and Law Review, 5, 01595. https://doi.org/10.37497/esg.v5issue.1596
  42. Moyson, S. (2024). I know better: Self-esteem, egocentrism, and policy learning in the liberalization of Belgian network industries. International Review of Public Policy, 6(6:2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.4000/12vzy
  43. Nor, A.I. (2025). The effect of training on public service delivery effectiveness in public sector organizations: the mediating role of civil servants performance. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2466788. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2466788
  44. Osborne, D., Plastrik, P. (1997). Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government. Public Strategies Group.
  45. Overman, S., Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a public administration theory of felt accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417
  46. Peters, B.G. (2024). Is there an institutional theory of comparative politics? Can there be. In Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, 501–513. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803929095.00041
  47. Rosenbloom, D.H., Kravchuk, R.S., Clerkin, R.M. (2022). Public Administration Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. Routledge.
  48. Sudha, A., Azam, S.M.F., Tham, J. (2023). Transformational leadership and job performance of Maldives Civil Service employees, mediated by organisational commitment. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2022-0198
  49. Sunkad, G. (2024). Public Administration-Concepts and Scope. International Journal of Social Health, 3(3), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.58860/ijsh.v3i3.172
  50. Verhoest, K., Peters, B.G., Bouckaert, G., Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 24(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.316
  51. Virtanen, P., Jalonen, H. (2024). Public value creation mechanisms in the context of public service logic: an integrated conceptual framework. Public Management Review, 26(8), 2331–2354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2268111
  52. Wu, X., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2018). Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9
  53. Xu, H. (2024). Regulatory fragmentation and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 44, 107191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107191
  54. Yang, W., Zhao, S. (2024). Management of civil services and the supply of civil servants. Public Administration, 102(4), 1513–1531. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12987
  55. Yin, R.K., Mudzakir, M.D. (1996). Studi kasus: desain dan metode. Rajagrafindo Persada.