Abstract

This study seeks to create a transformational project-based E-module featuring reflective video activities centered on local waste management challenges to foster environmental awareness among high school students in Depok, Indonesia. The module was tested with 10th grade students in a senior high school in Depok using the ADDIE model and a mixed-method approach. The e-module called "e-ling" has both asynchronous and synchronous functionalities and uses real-world waste management concerns as project-based activities. To see if the module was possible and useful, researchers used expert validation sheets, environmental sensitivity scales (before and after tests), and questionnaires for students and teachers. Expert evaluation in pedagogy, media, content, and language got an average score of 84.28%. Student and teacher answers showed that the material was very good (96% and 90%, respectively). Effectiveness testing showed that students' environmental sensitivity got a lot better, with an N-Gain score of 0.53 (moderate) and an average posttest score of 300 (high). These results indicate that the E-modul module is both viable and efficacious in improving students' environmental awareness, particularly with urban waste management issues in Depok.

Keywords

Transformative E-Module, Reflective Video, Environmental Sensitivity,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Abude, A.J. (2021). The effectiveness of modular distance learning modality to the academic performance of students: A literature review. Himalayan Journal of Education and Literature, 2(6), 44-46.
  2. Akpen, C.N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H. (2024). Impact of online learning on students' performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3, 205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0
  3. Almulla, M.A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach in Enhancing Students' Environmental Awareness. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020938702. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
  4. Brem, A.; Puente-Díaz, R. (2020) Creativity, Innovation, Sustainability: A Conceptual Model for Future Research Efforts. Sustainability, 12(8), 3139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083139
  5. Caymaz, B. (2020). Thematic Review of Some Studies About the Global Warming in Turkey. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 16–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=global+warming&pr=on&ff1=dtySince_2016&id=EJ1239360
  6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  7. Djuwita, R., Benyamin, A. (2019) Teaching Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Challenge in Indonesian Schools. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 2(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i1.48
  8. Elegbede, I.O, Matti-Sanni, R.O, Moriam, O., Emily Osa, I. (2023). Sustainability Education and Environmental Awareness. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_128-1
  9. El-Sabagh, H.A. (2021) Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
  10. Fatawa M. I., SantosaE., Hapsari D. P., & Krisantini. (2023). Changing rainfall and its adaptation strategies on tea plantation in West Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy), 51(2), 257-268. https://doi.org/10.24831/ija.v51i2.47081
  11. Garbarova, M., Fabus, J., Kremenova, I., Vartiak, L. (2023). Obstacles of distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and their immediate effect on the acquirement of digital skills. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(6), 47. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0146
  12. Hajj-Hassan, M., Chaker, R., Cederqvist, A.M. (2024). Environmental Education: A Systematic Review on the Use of Digital Tools for Fostering Sustainability Awareness. Sustainability, 16(9), 3733. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093733
  13. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  14. Hoti. A, Suat Kasap, Ardita Malaj. (2024). Fostering Entrepreneurial Mindset in Students: A Modular Framework for Integrating Entrepreneurship Education Into Engineering Capstone Projects. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0004
  15. Hsu, F.H., Lin, I.H., Yeh, H.C., Chen, N.S. (2022). Effect of Socratic Reflection Prompts via Video-Based Learning System on Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Computers & Education, 183, 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104497
  16. Hujjatusnaini, N., Corebima, A.D., Prawiro, S.R., Gofur, A. (2022). The Effect of blended project-based learning integrated with 21st-century skills on pre-service biology teachers' higher-order thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 104-118. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5498/71a0ab5b97675db86fd0d15adb1ccc18aab0.pdf
  17. Hungerford, H.R., & Volk, T.L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743
  18. Husamah, H., Rahardjanto, A., Permana, T.I., Lestari, N. (2025). Learning Media for Environmental Education, What Can the Scopus Database Tell Us? A Review. Al Jahiz: Journal of Biology Education Research, 6(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.32332/al-jahiz.v6i1.10401
  19. Ibe, E., Abamuche, J. (2019). Effects of audiovisual technological aids on students' achievement and interest in secondary school biology in Nigeria. Heliyon A Cell Press Journal, 5(6), e01812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01812
  20. Ibnu, D., Baga, S., Abbas, H., Nadiroh, Astra, I.M. (2023). Analisis Kepekaan Lingkungan Dan Kebutuhan Bahan Ajar Perubahan Lingkungan Siswa Sman 5 Kota Depok. IJEEM - Indonesian Journal of Environmental Education and Management, 8(2), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijeem.v8i2.36263
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climete Change (IPCC). (2021). Climete Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
  22. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
  23. Lepp, L., Leijen, A., Küüsvek, A., Kalk, K. (2023). Teacher education students’ first-time experiences of video-recording their teaching and analyzing it. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231196746. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231196746
  24. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. New York. https://legacy.voteview.com/pdf/Likert_1932.pdf
  25. Lindsey, R., Dahlman, L. (2024). Climate Change: Global Temperature. Climate.gov, 16, 1-5. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
  26. Logan, R.M. (2021). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(5), 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.004
  27. Luque-González, R., Fernández-Caminero, G., Álvarez-Castillo, J.L. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Project-Based Learning on Sustainable Development Goals Awareness and University Students' Growth. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.1.283
  28. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  29. Martinez-Garcia, A., Horrach-Rosselló, P., Mulet-Forteza, C. (2023). Evolution and current state of research into E-learning. Heliyon A Cell Press Journal, 9(10), e21016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21016
  30. Metzger, T., & McEwen, D. (1999). Measurement of Environmental Sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 38–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601883
  31. Navarrete, J., Giaconi, V., Contador, G., Vazquez, M. (2024). Another reason why normalized gain should continue to be used to analyze concept inventories (and estimate learning rates). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.07730
  32. Nickl, M., Huber, S.A., Sommerhoff, D., Codreanu, E., Ufer, S. (2022). Video-based simulations in teacher education: the role of learner characteristics as capacities for positive learning experiences and high performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00351-9
  33. Nurdin, A.M., Gofur, A., Sari, M.S., Munzil. (2025). Technology-supported differentiated biology education: Trends, methods, content, and impacts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2598. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16044
  34. Putri, S.G.C., Putrawan, I.M., Djamahar, R. (2022). Environmental Sensitivity Peserta Didik Terhadap Citizenship Behavior Yang Dimediasi Oleh Intention to Act Peserta Didik. IJEEM-Indonesian Journal of Environmental Education and Management, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijeem.v7i1.26068
  35. Richter, E., Hußner, I., Huang, Y., Richter, D., Lazarides, R. (2022). Video-based reflection in teacher education: Comparing virtual reality and real classroom videos. Computers & Education, 190, 104601.
  36. Rubini, B., Pursitasari, I.D., Suriansyah, M.I., Ramadhanti, G.N., Rachman, I. (2023). Improving Students' Eco-literacy through the Development of Electronic Interactive Teaching Materials on Climate Change. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 9(2), 288-308. https://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v9i2.20051
  37. Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2020). The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth System Science Data, 12(3), 1561–1623. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
  38. Sejati, K. (2009). Pengolahan sampah terpadu. Kanisius.
  39. Subari, A., Chatri, M., Fadilah, M., Vauzia. (2022). Development of E-Modules with a Guided Inquiry Approach on Ecology and Environmental Change Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(6), 2815–2826. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i6.2350
  40. Susilowati, D., Miarsyah, M., Sigit, D.V. (2020). The Influence of Environmental Sensitivity, Knowledge and Desire Issues (Intention to Act) with Students Behaviour as State Citizens towards Environment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v2i8.2764
  41. Villanueva, H.D., Campos, C.V. (2022). Learners’ Home-Based Learning Activities and Academic Achievement in Modular Learning. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(4), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1339
  42. Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017
  43. Zuhriyah, A. (2023). The role of smart education (SE) in supporting digital eco-literacy (DEL). The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 55(1), 167-171. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.74409