Abstract

The study aims to appraise the efficiency of 28 cement-producing Indian companies for the year 2022–23, applying an innovative combination of various multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches. Initially, output-oriented data envelopment analysis (DEA) and super-radial DEA are employed to examine operational productivity and compute super-efficiency scores, considering three outputs and four inputs. The analysis reveals that 71% of the companies exhibit pure technical efficiency, while 54% demonstrate scale and overall technical efficiency. Among the operationally proficient companies, 60% are small ones, suggesting that industry powerhouses struggle to leverage economies of scale effectively. Furthermore, the super-efficiency scores, alongside financial productivity proxies – F-score, G-score, C-score, and M-score – served as parameters for applying multi-criteria analysis. Accordingly, the criterion weight and rank of the companies are determined using LOgarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting (LOPCOW) and Axial Distance-based Aggregated Measurement (ADAM) methods, and Mangalam Cement appears as the frontrunner. However, different techniques of multi-criteria analysis may provide varied rankings due to deviations in computational methodology. Therefore, to strengthen the appraisal process, a two-phase sensitivity analysis was conducted, revealing a strong and significant association, as indicated by rank correlation coefficients and Friedman’s test. Eventually, the paper consolidated the varied performance scores using the Copeland method, and Barak Valley Cements emerges as the outperformer. The final rank indicates that among the top 10 firms, 40% are small players, while within the bottom 10, 30% are large and mid-sized firms. Moreover, the decision of big players to acquire efficient small companies post 2022–23 aligns with our findings.

Keywords

Super-efficiency, Piotroski F-score, Mohanram G-score, Montier C-score, Beneish M-score, LOPCOW, ADAM,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Abbasi, M., Kaviani, M.A. (2016). Operational efficiency-based ranking framework using uncertain DEA methods: an application to the cement industry in Iran. Management Decision, 54(4), 902-928. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2015-0413
  2. ACC Ltd. (2023). ACC Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis//8b5f12f7-052d-4799-9f46-ba55878f25b5.pdf
  3. Akintayo, B.D., Babatunde, O.M., Olanrewaju, O.A. (2024). Comparative analysis of cement production methods using a life cycle assessment and a multicriteria decision-making approach. Sustainability, 16(2), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020484
  4. Ambuja Cement Ltd. (2022). Ambuja Cement Ltd. Quarterly Report December – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ambujacement.com/-/media/Project/AmbujaLimited/Investor/Financial-result/AmbujaOutcomeOfBoardMeeting07022023.ashx
  5. Ambuja Cement Ltd. (2022). Ambuja Cement Ltd. Quarterly Report June – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ambujacement.com/-/media/Project/AmbujaLimited/Investor/Financial-result/Financial-Results---Ambuja-Cements-Ltd-Q2-2022.ashx
  6. Ambuja Cement Ltd. (2022). Ambuja Cement Ltd. Quarterly Report March – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ambujacement.com/-/media/Project/AmbujaLimited/Investor/Financial-result/Q12022ResultsAmbujaCementsLtd28042022.ashx
  7. Ambuja Cement Ltd. (2022). Ambuja Cement Ltd. Quarterly Report September – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.ambujacement.com/-/media/Project/AmbujaLimited/Investor/Financial-result/Outcome-of-Board-Meeting-Q3-FY-20221232.ashx
  8. Ambuja Cement Ltd. (2023). Ambuja Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis//0341734f-bc68-4a01-bdb2-060a54d7d83d.pdf
  9. Andersen, P., Petersen, N.C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 39(10), 1261-1264. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
  10. Anjani Portland Cement Ltd. (2023). Anjani Portland Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://anjanicement.com/investor/annualreports/Annual_report_22_23.pdf
  11. Balsara, S., Jain, P.K., Ramesh, A. (2021). An integrated methodology to overcome barriers to climate change mitigation strategies: a case of the cement industry in India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16), 20451-20475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11566-6
  12. Banerjee, A. (2018). Measuring the efficiency of Indian cement companies utilizing data envelopment analysis during the pre and post recession period. Serbian Journal of Management, 13(2), 201-213. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm13-14685
  13. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  14. Barak Valley Cements Ltd. (2023). Barak Valley Cements Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.barakcement.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/AnnualReport2023.pdf
  15. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  16. Beneish, M.D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v55.n5.2296
  17. Birla Corporation Ltd. (2023). Birla Corporation Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://birlacorporation.com/investors/annual-reports/Annual-Report-BCL-2022-23.pdf
  18. Borda, J.D. (1781). M’emoire sur les’ elections au scrutin. Histoire de l’Acad’emie Royale des Sciences.
  19. Chandrasekaran, S., Chitnis, A. (2019). Performance of Indian cement companies: A super efficiency DEA study. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on 4C’s-Communication, Commerce, Connectivity, Culture, SIMSARC 2018, 17-19 December 2018, Pune, MH, India. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-12-2018.2283810
  20. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  21. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software). New York: springer, 2, 489. https://doi.org/10.1007/b109347
  22. Copeland, A.H. (1951). A reasonable social welfare function. Mimeo, 1951. University of Michigan.
  23. Dancelli, L., Manisera, M., Vezzoli, M. (2013). On two classes of Weighted Rank Correlation measures deriving from the Spearman’s ρ. In Statistical models for data analysis Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00032-9_13
  24. Dasgupta, D., Das, S. (2021). Sustainability performance of the Indian cement industry. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23(4), 1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-020-01998-6
  25. Deb, D., Gillet, P., De, A. (2025). The impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance in India: an investigation using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 29(2), 184-211. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2025.144681
  26. Deccan Cements Ltd. (2023). Deccan Cements Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://deccancements.com/pdf/Deccan-Cements-Ltd-43rd%20Annual-Report.pdf
  27. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
  28. Dortaj, A., Maghsoudy, S., Ardejani, F.D., Eskandari, Z. (2020). A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method for site selection of subsurface dams in semi-arid region of Iran. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100284
  29. Ecer, F., Pamucar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 112, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2022.102690
  30. Exposito, A., Sanchis-Llopis, J.A. (2018). Innovation and business performance for Spanish SMEs: New evidence from a multi-dimensional approach. International Small Business Journal, 36(8), 911-931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242618782596
  31. Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the royal statistical society: series A (General), 120(3), 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  32. Fernando, A., Siriwardana, C., Gunasekara, C., Law, D.W., Zhang, G., Gamage, J.C.P.H. (2024). A social assessment framework to Derive a Social Score for Green Material Selection: A Case Study from the Sri Lankan Cement Industry. Sustainability, 16(15),6632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156632
  33. Fodor, J.C., Roubens, M.R. (2013). Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support Science & Business Media. Springer, 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1648-2
  34. Franklin, B. (1772). From Benjamin Franklin to Joseph Priestley, 19 September 1772.
  35. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing Inc., Boston.
  36. Geetha, T.N., Ramasamy, S. (2014). A study on the financial performance efficiency of selected cement industries in India. International Journal of Emerging Engineering Research and Technology, 2(3), 106-111.
  37. Hajihassani, V. (2015). Investigate factors affecting on the performance of cement industry based on Copeland Method. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S9), 45-48. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS9/68597
  38. Heidelbergcement India Ltd. (2023). Heidelbergcement India Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.mycemco.com/sites/default/files/PDF/Annual_reports/HCIL_AnnualReport_FY23.pdf
  39. Hoang, P.D., Nguyen, L.T., Tran, B.Q., Ta, D.T. (2024). Corporate governance for sustainable development in Vietnam: Criteria for SOEs based on MCDM approach. Plos one, 19(5), e0302306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302306
  40. Hobbs, B.F., Chankong, V., Hamadeh, W., Stakhiv, E.Z. (1992). Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning. Water Resources Research, 28(7), 1767-1779. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00712
  41. Husain, A.M., Hasan, M.M., Khan, Z.A., Asjad, M. (2024). A robust decision-making approach for the selection of an optimal renewable energy source in India. Energy Conversion and Management, 301, 117989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117989
  42. Hwang, G., Han, J.H., Chang, T.W. (2020). An integrated key performance measurement for manufacturing operations management. Sustainability, 12(13), 5260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135260
  43. India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) Report (2025). Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/download/1744101698_Cement-February-2025.pdf
  44. India Cements Ltd. (2023). India Cements Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.indiacements.co.in/uploads/investor/pdf/16930475147ANNUEPOR2023.pdf
  45. Infomerics Valuation and Rating Pvt. Ltd., (2024). Cementing Growth: Opportunities and Challenges in India’s Cement Sector” Retrieved from https://www.infomerics.com/admin/uploads/Cement-Industry-nov24.pdf
  46. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  47. JK Cement Ltd. (2023). JK Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.jkcement.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/JK-Cement-IR2023.pdf
  48. JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd. (2023). JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.jklakshmicement.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/AR22-23.pdf
  49. Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Ltd. (2023). Kakatiya Cement Sugar & Industries Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from http://www.kakatiyacements.com/Admin/investors/AnnualReport/AR-2022-2023.pdf
  50. Kaya, A., Pamucar, D., Gürler, H.E., Ozcalici, M. (2024). Determining the financial performance of the firms in the Borsa Istanbul sustainability index: integrating multi criteria decision making methods with simulation. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00512-3
  51. Kazancoglu, Y., Kazancoglu, I., Sagnak, M. (2018). Fuzzy DEMATEL-based green supply chain management performance: application in cement industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(2), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2017-0121
  52. Keerthi Industries Ltd. (2023). Keerthi Industries Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from http://www.keerthiindustries.com/images/Annualreports/Revised-40th-AnnualReport-2022-23_Final.pdf
  53. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525
  54. Kesoram Industries Ltd. (2023). Kesoram Industries Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.kesocorp.com/DOCS/pdf/mgc/2022-2023-annual-report.pdf
  55. Khan, N.Z., Ansari, T.S.A., Siddiquee, A.N., Khan, Z.A. (2019). Selection of E-learning websites using a novel Proximity Indexed Value (PIV) MCDM method. Journal of Computers in Education, 6, 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00135-7
  56. Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G.P., Miglietta, P.P., Tadić, S., Roso, V. (2022). Applicability of industry 4.0 technologies in the reverse logistics: a circular economy approach based on comprehensive distance based ranking (COBRA) method. Sustainability, 14(9), 5632. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095632
  57. Krstić, M., Agnusdei, G.P., Tadić, S., Kovač, M., Miglietta, P.P. (2023). A novel axial-distance-based aggregated measurement (ADAM) method for the evaluation of agri-food circular-economy-based business models. Mathematics, 11(6), 1334. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061334
  58. Kulkarni, G.S., Belavadi, N. (2025). Environmental factors and financial performance: Evidence from the Indian cement industry. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 14(2), 632-653. https://doi.org/10.18488/11.v14i2.4278
  59. Kumar, M., Raj, N., Singh, R.R. (2023). Ranking Indian Companies on Sustainability Disclosures Using the GRI-G4 Framework and MCDM Techniques. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180917
  60. Kumar, P., Sharma, D. (2024). Prioritising the financial performance of Indian private sector banks by a hybrid MCDM approach. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 16(4), 490-511. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2024.137145
  61. Kumar, R. (2016). Financial performance evaluation of cement-majors in India: An application of TOPSIS method. Asian Journal of Technology and Management Research (AJTMR), 6(02), 18-22.
  62. Kundi, M., Sharma, S. (2015). Efficiency analysis and flexibility: A case study of cement firms in India. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16, 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-015-0094-0
  63. Kurian, M.C., PR, S., VR, P. (2020). Maintenance strategy selection in a cement industry using analytic network process. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 26(4), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-07-2017-0048
  64. Maity, B., Suresh, V., Baidya, M.K. (2019). Performance of Indian Cement Industry: Drivers, Models and Empirics. Global Economy Journal, 19(02), 1950009. https://doi.org/10.1142/S219456591950009X
  65. Majumder, M., Saha, A.K. (2016). Multi Criteria Decision Making. In: Feasibility Model of Solar Energy Plants by ANN and MCDM Techniques. SpringerBriefs in Energy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-308-8_3
  66. Marinelli, M., Janardhanan, M. (2022). Green cement production in India: prioritization and alleviation of barriers using the best–worst method. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(42), 63988-64003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20217-x
  67. Mangalam Cement Ltd. (2023). Mangalam Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.mangalamcement.com/pdf/annual_report/Annual-Report-2022-23.pdf
  68. Mehta, K., Sharma, R., Vyas, V. (2019). Efficiency and ranking of sustainability index of India using DEA-TOPSIS. Journal of Indian Business Research, 11(2), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-02-2018-0057
  69. Mirmozaffari, M., Shadkam, E., Khalili, S.M., Kabirifar, K., Yazdani, R., Asgari Gashteroodkhani, T. (2021). A novel artificial intelligent approach: Comparison of machine learning tools and algorithms based on optimization DEA Malmquist productivity index for eco-efficiency evaluation. International journal of energy sector management, 15(3), 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-02-2020-0003
  70. Moghimi, R., Anvari, A. (2014). An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach and analysis to evaluate the financial performance of Iranian cement companies. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71(1), 685-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5370-6
  71. Mohanram, P.S. (2005). Separating winners from losers among lowbook-to-market stocks using financial statement analysis. Review of accounting studies, 10(2), 133-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1526-4
  72. Mokhtar, A., Nasooti, M. (2020). A decision support tool for cement industry to select energy efficiency measures. Energy Strategy Reviews, 28, 100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100458
  73. Montier, J. (2009). Cooking the books, or, more sailing under the black flag. Societe Generale Mind Matters, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119209195.ch25
  74. Morrow III, W.R., Hasanbeigi, A., Sathaye, J., Xu, T. (2014). Assessment of energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in India’s cement and iron & steel industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.022
  75. Mudgal, V., Chellasamy, A. (2024). Growth of Indian cement industry, its environment impact and emerging alternatives: A Review. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences (IJEMS), 31(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijems.v31i1.7145
  76. NCL Industries Ltd. (2023). NCL Industries Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.nclind.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/NCL_Annual_Report_2022_23.pdf
  77. Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd. (2023). Nuvoco Vistas Corporation Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://admin.nuvoco.com/public/Corporate/Annual_Reports/Integrated_Annual_Report_FY23.pdf
  78. Official website of the Cement Manufactures Association of India. Retrieved from https://www.cmaindia.org/
  79. Orient Cement Ltd. (2023). Orient Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://orientcement.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Orient-Cement-Annual-Report-FY2022-23.pdf
  80. Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert systems with applications, 42(6), 3016-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
  81. Piotroski, J.D. (2000). Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers. Journal of Accounting Research, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672906
  82. Pishdar, M., Danesh Shakib, M., Antucheviciene, J., Vilkonis, A. (2021). Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Super SBM Network DEA for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Third-Party Logistics Service Providers Considering Circular Economy Strategies in the Era of Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 13(11), 6497. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116497
  83. Poudyal, L., Adhikari, K. (2021). Environmental sustainability in cement industry: An integrated approach for green and economical cement production. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 4, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100024
  84. Prism Johnson Ltd. (2023). Prism Johnson Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.prismjohnson.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Annual-Report-2022-23-1.pdf
  85. Raikar, A.V. (2018). An analytical study of the cement sector and selected cement companies in India by using multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and VIKOR. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 8(5), 1-11. https://www.indusedu.org/pdfs/IJRMEC/IJRMEC_1803_79546.pdf
  86. Reddy, M.S., Saleem, S. (2016). Performance Evaluation of Indian Cement and IT Companies: An Efficiency-Profitability Matrix Approach. SGBED wishes to recognize the following sponsors, 732.
  87. Research and Markets Report (June). Retrieved from https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5759969/india-cement-industry-market-size-and-forecast
  88. Sagar Cement Ltd. (2023). Sagar Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://sagarcements.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Scl-Integrated-Report-2022-23.pdf
  89. Sahoo, S.K., Goswami, S.S. (2023). A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: advancements, applications, and future directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.31181/dma1120237
  90. Sanghi Cement Ltd. (2023). Sanghi Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.sanghicement.com/wp-content/uploads/SIL_Annual_Report_FY_2022_23.pdf
  91. Sangwan, K.S., Bhakar, V., Digalwar, A.K. (2019). A sustainability assessment framework for cement industry–a case study. Benchmarking An International Journal, 26(2), 470-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2018-0021
  92. Saurashtra Cement Ltd. (2023). Saurashtra Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.bseindia.com/xml-data/corpfiling/AttachHis//a3fabdc8-ae79-41ee-9d17-ca06db69755d.pdf
  93. Seretidou, D., Billios, D.,Stavropoulos, A. (2025). Integrative Analysis of Traditional and Cash Flow Financial Ratios: Insights from a Systematic Comparative Review. Risks, 13(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13040062
  94. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal, 27(3), 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  95. Sharma, S. (2008). Analyzing the technical and scale efficiency performance: A case study of cement firms in India. Journal of advances in Management Research, 5(2), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1108/09727980810949133
  96. Shekhar, C. (2017). A Study on the Performance Efficiency of Cement Sector in India. International Educational Scientific Research Journal, 3(3), 36.
  97. Shi, X. (2019). Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of Chinese Industry Systems by Using Non‐Cooperative Two‐Stage DEA Model. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019(1), 9208367. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9208367
  98. Shree Cement Ltd. (2023). Shree Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.shreecement.com/uploads/investors/Annual_Report_2022_23.pdf
  99. Shree Digvijay Cement Company Ltd. (2023). Shree Digvijay Cement Company Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.digvijaycement.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/78th-Annual-Report-FY-2022-23.pdf
  100. Shri Keshav Cements & Infra Ltd. (2023). Shri Keshav Cements & Infra Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://fab74c66-ffe6-492c-9c1d-ee315c8d6520.usrfiles.com/ugd/703249_38837ba901894385b73cf2e7c8c4e1db.pdf
  101. Shrivastava, S., RL, S. (2017). A systematic literature review on green manufacturing concepts in cement industries. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2014-0028
  102. Singh, R.K., Modgil, S. (2020). Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS–a case study of Indian cement industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 24(2), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-07-2018-0041
  103. Star Cement Ltd. (2023). Star Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.starcement.co.in/pdf/annual-reports/Annual-Report-2022-23.pdf
  104. Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A.,Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers & industrial engineering, 140, 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
  105. The KCP Ltd. (2023). The KCP Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from http://www.kcp.co.in/downloads/financial-results/Annual_report_2023.pdf
  106. The Ramco Cement Ltd. (2023). The Ramco Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://ramcocements.in/cms/uploads/RAMCO_CEMENTS_AR_2023_e7be360a72.pdf
  107. Tudu, S., Das, D.S. (2024). Analysis of Financial Performance Using VIKOR MCDM Method – A Study on Selected Indian Cement Companies. Advanced Trends in Multidisciplinary Research, 15.
  108. Ultratech Cement Ltd. (2023). Ultratech Cement Ltd. Annual Report 2022–23. Retrieved from https://www.ultratechcement.com/content/dam/ultratechcementwebsite/pdf/financials/annual-reports/integrated-and-sustainability-report-2023-double-page.pdf
  109. Valizadeh Oghani, A., Modarres Khiyabani, F., Fegh-Hi Farahmand, N. (2020). Data envelopment analysis technique to measure the management ability: Evidence from Iran Cement industry. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1801960. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1801960
  110. Varmazyar, M., Dehghanbaghi, M., Afkhami, M. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Evaluation and program planning, 58, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.005
  111. Vikas., Bansal, R (2019). Efficiency evaluation of Indian oil and gas sector: data envelopment analysis. International journal of emerging markets, 14(2), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-01-2018-0016
  112. Wu, W.W. (2011). Beyond Travel & Tourism competitiveness ranking using DEA, GST, ANN and Borda count. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12974-12982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.096
  113. Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management decision, 57(9), 2501-2519. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0458
  114. Zavadskas, E.K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(02), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622016500036
  115. Zavadskas, E. K., Cavallaro, F., Podvezko, V., Ubarte, I., & Kaklauskas, A. (2017). MCDM assessment of a healthy and safe built environment according to sustainable development principles: A practical neighborhood approach in Vilnius. Sustainability, 9(5), 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050702
  116. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making, McGraw-Hill company.
  117. Zeleny, M. (1998). Multiple criteria decision-making: Eight concepts of optimality. Human Systems Management, 17(2), 97-107.
  118. Sałabun, W., Urbaniak, K. (2020, June). A new coefficient of rankings similarity in decision-making problems. In International conference on computational science Cham, Springer, 632-645. International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_47
  119. ACC Ltd. (2022). ACC Ltd. Quarterly Report March – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.acclimited.com/-/media/Project/ACC-Limited/Investor/Finanical-Result/2022/ACC-Outcome-of-the-Board-Meeting-for-the-quarter-ended-March-31-2022.ashx
  120. ACC Ltd. (2022). ACC Ltd. Quarterly Report June – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.acclimited.com/-/media/Project/ACC-Limited/Investor/Finanical-Result/2022/Outcome-of-the-Board-Meeting-for-the-quarter-and-half-year-ended-June-30-2022.ashx
  121. ACC Ltd. (2022). ACC Ltd. Quarterly Report September – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.acclimited.com/-/media/Project/ACC-Limited/Investor/Finanical-Result/2022/File-no-1.ashx
  122. ACC Ltd. (2022). ACC Ltd. Quarterly Report December – 2022. Retrieved from https://www.acclimited.com/-/media/Project/ACC-Limited/Investor/Finanical-Result/2022/ACCUnauditedFinancialResultsDecember2022.ashx