Abstract

Phonological representations are considered the source of speech sound information that forms the basis of spoken words. Phonological awareness tasks, as well as other expressive tasks, are used to infer phonological representations. However, receptive tasks are increasingly used to assess phonological representations in preschool children. Since the phonological structures vary in each language, there is an increasing need to examine the underlying representations in various languages. The present study evaluated articulation error identification for vowels and consonants in Malayalam speaking preschool children aged 3.6 to 5 years. An articulation error identification and correction test for vowels and consonants developed by the investigators was administered to all the participants. Thirty words with clusters within the vocabulary of children aged 3.6 to 5 years were used as target items for the test. The results revealed that age had a significant effect on the scores obtained in the tasks, with children in the older age group scoring higher than the younger age group. Better scores were obtained for consonants than for vowels, signifying a developmental trend in the ability to detect subtle articulatory modifications. From the results it is evident that preschool children have developed adequate phonological representations to distinguish errors in a single phoneme. The results also support the pivotal role of articulation error identification tasks for the assessment of underlying phonological representations in preschool children. Data of Phonological representations in Malayalam speaking preschool children is less. This study aimed at understanding the phonological representations in Malayalam speaking preschool children in the age range of 3.6-5.0 years.

Keywords

Phonological Representations, Preschool Children, Age Groups, Quality of Phonological Representation,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Anthony, J.L., Williams, J.M., Aghara, R.G., Dunkelberger, M., Novak, B., Mukherjee, A.D. (2010). Assessment of individual differences in phonological representation. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 969–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9185-7
  2. Claessen, M., Heath, S., Fletcher, J., Hogben, J., & Leitão, S. (2009). Quality of phonological representations: a window into the lexicon?. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820801966317
  3. Dodd, B. (2021). Re-evaluating evidence for best practice in paediatric speech-language pathology. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica: Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 73(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505265
  4. Dollaghan, C., Campbell, T.F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 41(5), 1136–1146. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4105.1136
  5. Edwards, J., Lahey, M. (1996). Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 39(6), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3906.1263
  6. Elbro, C., Petersen, D.K. (2004). Long-term effects of phoneme awareness and letter sound training: An intervention study with children at risk for dyslexia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 660–670. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.660
  7. Fowler, A.E., Swainson, B. (2004). Phonological representation in children with speech and language disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(1), 117–128.
  8. Foy, J.G., Mann, V. (2001). Does strength of phonological representations predict phonological awareness in preschool children? Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716401003022
  9. Gillon, G. (2023). Supporting children who are English Language Learners succeed in their early literacy development. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica: Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP), 75(4), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1159/000531407
  10. Goswami, U., Thomson, J., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S., Scott, S.K. (2002). Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(16), 10911–10916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122368599
  11. Graham, S., Silva, M., Restrepo, M.A. (2022). Reading intervention research with emergent bilingual students: a meta-analysis. Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10399-8
  12. Mahr, T.J., & Hustad, K.C. (2023). Lexical Predictors of Intelligibility in Young Children's Speech. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research:JSLHR, 66(8S), 3013–3025. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00294
  13. McHale-Small, M., Tridas, E., S., Cárdenas-Hagan, E., Allsopp, DH, van Ingen Lauer, S., Scott, K., & Elbeheri, G. (2023). Specific Learning Disabilities Principles and Standards. Learning Disabilities Association of America. ldaamerica. org.
  14. McNeill, B.C., Gillon, G.T., Dodd, B. (2009). Phonological awareness and early reading development in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820801997353
  15. Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.005
  16. Neenu, S., Vipina, V.P., Vrinda, R., Sreedevi, N. (2011). Malayalam Diagnostic Articulation Test-Revised (3–6 Years). All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.
  17. Pomper, R., Ellis Weismer, S., Saffran, J., Edwards, J. (2019). Specificity of phonological representations for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(8), 3351–3363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04054-5
  18. Priya, M.B. (2017).Test Battery for Phonological Representations in Kannada Speaking Children. University of Mysore.
  19. Priya, M.B., Manjula, R. (2016). Articulation judgement abilities and phonological representations in typically developing pre-schoolers. Journal of Advanced Linguistic studies, 5(1-2), 175-197.
  20. Singhi, P., Kumar, M., Malhi, P., Kumar, R. (2007). Utility of the WHO Ten Questions Screen for disability detection in a rural community the North Indian experience. Journal of tropical pediatrics, 53(6), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmm047
  21. Sutherland, D., Gillon, G.T. (2005). Assessment of phonological representations in children with speech impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(4), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/030)
  22. Velleman, J. D. (2020). On being me: A personal invitation to philosophy. Princeton University Press.
  23. Von Holzen, K., Bergmann, C. (2021). The development of infants’ responses to mispronunciations: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 57(1), 1–18. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/dev0001141