This paper illustrates the information literacy (IL) strategy in an undergraduate Management program at U.S. Coast Guard Academy. The paper exemplifies a sequential approach that improves students’ capabilities to evaluate and apply information in a specifically designed learning environment while generating new knowledge in undergraduate business coursework. The paper also emphasizes how IL can be developed within management coursework through a six-step process, including defining, locating, selecting, organizing, presenting, and assessing.  This specially designed framework of IL learning can be applied across all relevant courses using specially designed assignments in the Management major.


Management Education, Information Literacy, Strategy, Assignments, Curriculum Integration,


Metrics Loading ...


  1. S.S. Birkollu, Y. Yucesoy, B. Baglama, S. Kanbul, (2017). Investigating the Attitudes of Preservice Teachers Towards Technology Based on Various Variables, TEM Journal, 6, 578–583.
  2. M. Farkas, (2012). Participatory Technologies, Pedagogy 2.0 and Information Literacy. Library Hi Tech, 30, 82–94.
  3. American Library Association, (ALA), (2000). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
  4. J.A. Greene, B.Y. Seung, D.Z. Copeland, (2014). Measuring Critical Components of Digital Literacy and Their Relationships with Learning, Computer Education, 76, 55–69.
  5. A. Carbery, N. Hegarty, (2011). Introducing Problem-based Learning into One-shot Information Literacy Instruction at Waterford Institute of Technology Libraries, SCONUL Focus, 53, 30–33.
  6. N.F. Foster, S. Gibbons, (2007) Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester, Assn of College and Research Libraries, Chicago.
  7. L. Carder, P. Willingham, D. Bibb, (2001). Case-based, Problem-based Learning: Information Literacy for the Real World, Research Strategies, 18, 181–190.
  8. G. Ghaith, (2010). An Exploratory Study of the Achievement of the Twenty-first Century Skills in Higher Education, Education and Training, 52, 489–98.
  9. L. Pagani, G. Argentin, M. Gui, L. Stanca, (2016). The Impact of Digital Skills on Educational Outcomes: Evidence from Performance Tests, Educational Studies, 42, 137–162.
  10. R. Scherer, A. Rohatgi, O.E. Hatlevik, (2017). Students’ Profiles of ICT Use: Identification, Determinants, and Relations to Achievement in a Computer and Information Literacy Test, Computer and Human Behavior, 70, 486–499.
  11. M.E. Huba, J.E. Freed, (2000). Learner-centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
  12. K. Wenger, (2014). Problem-Based Learning and Information Literacy: A Natural Partnership, Pennsylvania Libraries: Research and Practice, 2, 142-154.
  13. M.A. Hubbard, M. Lotts, (2013). Special Collections, Primary Resources, and Information Literacy Pedagogy, Communications in Information Literacy, 7, 24-38.
  14. M. Moll, (2009). Information Literacy in the New Curriculum, South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 75, 40-45.
  15. E.E. Jarosz, S. Kutay, (2017). Guided Resource Inquiries: Integrating Archives into Course Learning and Information Literacy Objectives, Communications in Information Literacy, 11, 204-220.
  16. Association of College and Research Libraries, (2000). Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, American Library Association, Chicago.
  17. Association of College and Research Libraries, (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  18. A.l. Welker, A. Fry, L. McCarthy J. Komlos, (2010). An Integrated Approach to Information Literacy Instruction in Civil Engineering, Fall 2010 Mid-Atlantic ASEE Conference, 15-16.
  19. E.E. Allen, (1995). Active Learning and Teaching: Improving Postsecondary Library instruction, Reference Librarian (51-52), 89-103.
  20. I.A. Mokhtar, S. Majid, S. Foo, (2008). Teaching Information Literacy Through Learning Styles, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 40, 93-109.
  21. S.A. Smith, (2004). Designing Collaborative Learning Experiences for Library Computer Classrooms, College and Undergraduate Libraries, 11, 65-83.
  22. E.S. Grassian, J.R. Kaplowitz, (2001). Information Literacy Instruction: Theory and Practice, Neal-Schuman, New York.
  23. L. Wang, (2007). Sociocultural Learning Theories and Information Literacy Teaching Activities in Higher Education, Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47, 149-158.
  24. J. Keene, J. Colvin, J. Sissons, (2010). Mapping Student Information Literacy Activity Against Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Skills, Journal of Information Literacy, 41, 6-21.
  25. M.B. Eisenberg, (2008). Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age, Journal of Library and Information Technology, 28, 39-47.
  26. C. Black, S. Crest, M. Volland, (2001). Building a Successful Information Literacy Infrastructure on The Foundation of Librarian-Faculty Collaboration, Research Strategies, 18, 215-225.
  27. J. Scales, G. Matthews, C.M. Johnson, (2005). Compliance, Cooperation, Collaboration and Information Literacy, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31, 229-235.
  28. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards Review Task Force, Task Force Recommendations, 13, (2012) http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/ils_recomm.pdf.
  29. E. Argelagós, M. Pifarré, (2017). Unravelling Secondary Students’ Challenges in Digital Literacy: A Gender Perspective, Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5, 42–55.
  30. A. Aslan, C. Zhu, (2017). Investigating Variables Predicting Turkish Pre-service Teachers’ Integration of ICT into Teaching Practices, British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 552–570.
  31. L. Saunders, (2012). Faculty Perspectives on Information Literacy as a Student Learning Outcome, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38, 226-236.
  32. Association of College and Research Libraries, (1998). Information Literacy competency standards for higher education; American Association of School Librarians, Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning, American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/informationpower/InformationLiteracyStandards_final.pdf.
  33. J. Donnahan, B.B. Stein, (1999). Assessment: A Tool for Developing Lifelong Learners. In B. K. Stripling, Learning and Libraries in an Information Age, Principles and Practice, Libraries Unlimited, Littleton