Abstract

This study presents the experimental findings on a Novel Geomaterial (NGM) developed using bottom ash as the primary constituent material. The NGM was made by mixing bottom ash with blast furnace slag and some expanded polystyrene beads, and it relied on ordinary Portland cement as the binder for real. Five different EPS bead contents 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% and 1.0% were considered as mix ratios. Blast furnace slag was incorporated at three replacement levels of 4%, 8%, and 12%. In addition, two cement to bottom ash weight ratios, 20% and 30%, were adopted in the study. The experimental program looked at compressive strength, the stress-strain behavior, density, plus the initial tangent modulus for the NGM while using various mix designs and different curing times. The researchers performed compressive strength tests on 70 mm cube samples that were cured for 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days. The results indicate that compressive strength consistently improved with increasing slag content, higher cement dosage, and longer curing duration across all mix ratios, with recorded strengths ranging from 135 kPa to 1020 kPa. The stress–strain behavior exhibited a nonlinear relationship, with compressive stress increasing progressively with axial strain. Furthermore, the density of the prepared NGM decreased from 993 kg/m³ to 611 kg/m³ depending on the mix ratios, while the initial tangent modulus showed a positive correlation with compressive strength. The findings show a kind of manageable trade-off between density and short-term compressive behavior, but the whole thing around environmental sustainability and field readiness is still up in the air, mostly because embodied carbon assessment, leachability checks, durability testing, and wider field-scale validation still need to be done.

Keywords

Novel Geomaterial, Bottom Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Beads, Resilience, Compressive Strength and Density,

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. D. Kumar, N. Kumar, A. Gupta, Geotechnical properties of fly and bottom ash mixtures in different proportions. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(9), (2014) 1487–1494. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SEP14444
  2. Z.T. Yao, M.S. Xia, P.K. Sarker, T.Z. Chen, A review of the alumina recovery from coal fly ash, with a focus in China. Fuel, 120, (2014) 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.003
  3. Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 8112. (1989). Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland cement. New Delhi, India.
  4. B. Kim, M. Prezzi, R. Salgado, Geotechnical properties of fly and bottom ash mixtures for use in highway embankments. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(7), (2005) 914–924. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:7(914)
  5. B.L. Phillips, J. Groppo, R. Perrone, Evaluation of processed bottom ash for use as lightweight aggregate in the production of concrete masonry units. In Proceedings World of Coal Ash (WOCA), (2005) 1–10.
  6. M.S.H.M. Sani, F.B. Muftah, Z. Muda, The properties of special concrete using washed bottom ash (WBA) as partial sand replacement. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 1(2), (2010) 65–76. https://journal.uthm.edu.my/index.php/IJSCET/article/view/64
  7. A.Y. Pande, A.H. Padade, Engineering performance of lightweight geomaterial influenced by EPS density and mix ratio. Emerging Materials Research, 12(4), (2023) 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1680/jemmr.23.00041
  8. P.E. Tsakiridis, G.D. Papadimitriou, S. Tsivilis, C. Koroneos, Utilization of steel slag for Portland cement clinker production. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(2), (2008) 805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.093
  9. A. Al-Rawas, Microfabric and mineralogical studies on the stabilization of an expansive soil using cement by-pass dust and some types of slags. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(5), (2002) 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-046
  10. S. Wild, J.M. Kinuthia, G.M. Jones, D.D. Higgins, Effects of partial substitution of lime with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) on the strength properties of lime-stabilized sulphate-bearing clay soils. Engineering Geology, 51(1), (1998) 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00039-8
  11. D. Mandal, B. Ram Rathan Lal, Compressive and Flexural Behaviour of Glass Fibre Reinforced Blast Furnace Slag Based Material. In: Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K., Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Dubey, B.K., Bansal, A. (eds) Sustainable Environment and Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer, Cham, 90, (2021) 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51354-2_14
  12. H.R. Nikhade, B. Ram Rathan Lal, Studies on sugarcane bagasse ash and blast furnace slag based geomaterial. In Proceedings IGGEC 2021, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 280, (2022) 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480472.091
  13. H.R. Nikhade, B. Ram Rathan Lal, Effect of addition of glass fibers on sugar cane bagasse ash under compressive loading. Materials Today: Proceedings, 61(3), (2022) 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.063
  14. H.R. Nikhade, B. Ram Rathan Lal, K. Ansari, M.A. Khan, H.M. Najm, S.M. Anas, M. Mursaleen, M.A. Hasan, S. Islam, Behaviour of geomaterial composite using sugar cane bagasse ash under compressive and flexural loading. Frontiers in Materials, 10, (2023) 1108717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2023.1108717
  15. D. Mandal, B. Ram Rathan Lal, K. Shanker. (2018). Compressive strength behaviour of glass fibre reinforced blast furnace slag-based material. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Geosynthetics (ICG 2018).
  16. D. Mandal, B. Ram Rathan Lal. (2019). Compressive load behavior of glass fiber reinforced blast furnace slag-based material. In Proceedings National Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure Development and Management (SIDM-97). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3380074
  17. J.S. Horvath, Expanded polystyrene geofoam: An introduction to material behaviour. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13(4), (1994) 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5
  18. J.S. Horvath, The compressible-inclusion functions of EPS geofoam: Analysis and design methodologies. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 15(1-3), (1997) 77–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00008-3
  19. H.L. Liu, A. Deng, J. Chu, Effect of different mixing ratios of polystyrene pre-puff beads and cement on the mechanical behaviour of lightweight fills. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24, (2006) 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.002
  20. B. Ram Rathan Lal, V.N. Badwaik, Experimental studies on bottom ash and expanded polystyrene beads-based geomaterial. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 20(2), (2015) 04015020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000305
  21. D. Mandal, B. Ram Rathan Lal, Compressive and Flexural Behaviour of Glass Fibre Reinforced Blast Furnace Slag Based Material. In: Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K., Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Dubey, B.K., Bansal, A. (eds) Sustainable Environment and Infrastructure. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer, Cham, 90, (2021) 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51354-2_14
  22. V.R. Marjive, B. Ram Rathan Lal, An experimental study on stone dust and EPS beads based material. In GeoChicago 2016: Sustainability, Energy and the Geoenvironment, (2016) pp. 33–41.
  23. V.R. Marjive, B. Ram Rathan Lal, (2016) Compressive strength behaviour of stone dust and EPS beads-based material. In Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480151.004
  24. A.Y. Pande, A.H. Padade, Engineering potential of pond ash geomaterial: A lightweight filling solution. International Journal of Geomechanics, 24(8), (2024) 04024175. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8388
  25. A.H. Padade, J.N. Mandal, Expanded polystyrene-based geomaterial with fly ash. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14(6), (2014) 06014013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000390
  26. B. Ram Rathan Lal, S.S. Nawkhare, Experimental study on plastic strips and EPS beads reinforced bottom ash based geomaterial. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2(3), (2016) 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0066-2
  27. I. Qamhia, E. Tutumluer, J. Nicks, M. Adams, M. Khan, Lightweight and alternative backfills for highway applications: State-of-the-art practice in the U.S.A. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2678(5), (2024) 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231191519
  28. T.D. Stark, D. Arellano, J.S. Horvath, D. Leshchinsky, (2004). Geofoam Application in Design and Construction of Highway Embankments, NCHRP Web Document 65. Washington, DC, USA: Transportation Research Board.
  29. A.H. Padade, J.N. Mandal, Feasibility studies on expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam. In Proceedings International Conference on Ground Improvement and Ground Technique (IGCI-2012), 2, (2012) 903–976.
  30. S.S. Nawkhare, B.R.R. Lal, Experimental studies on reinforced bottom ash based geomaterial. In Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, 280, (2017) 852–861. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480472.091