Abstract

In this paper, a parameter adaption method is suggested for MANET routing efficiency enhancement. It combines the EAOMDV protocol with intelligent Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO). Improving the network's routing patterns through the use of several quality-of-service (QoS) indicators is the main goal. Some of these metrics are the rate of packet delivery (PDR), residual energy, end-to-end delay, and routing overhead. By merging normalized performance measures into a single fitness function, the suggested strategy reframes a weighted single-objective problem as route optimization. In order to automatically optimize routing parameters and choose ideal routes, the suggested system uses GWO, which is modeled after the pack structure and hunting methods used by grey wolves. Better fault tolerance and route stability are achieved by the use of EAOMDV, which guarantees the preservation of multiple loop-free pathways. To avoid optimizing faulty or redundant paths, a method called discrete path validation is used. Many simulations have been run with different node densities and mobility parameters. The proposed GWO-EAOMDV framework outperforms both traditional EAOMDV and alternative optimization-based routing protocols. Reduces end-to-end latency by 15-22% while simultaneously enhancing PDR by 12-18% and improving energy efficiency. The robustness of the proposed model was confirmed by statistical validation employing several simulation runs.

Keywords

Adhoc Networks, Routing Protocols, Packet Delivery Ratio, Throughput, Dynamic, Environment, Grey Wolf Algorithm and EAOMDV,

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A.M. Alwakeel, Enhancing IoT Performance in Wireless and Mobile Networks Through Named Data Networking (NDN) and Edge Computing Integration. Computer Networks, 264, (2025) 111267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111267
  2. K. Muthineni, M. Nájar Martón, J. Vidal Manzano, Perspective Chapter: Factory of the Future–Integrating Wireless Communication. Sensing, and localization with 5G and 6G. In Industry 4.0 - Transforming the Future beyond Manufacturing - 1, Digital Technologies and Smart Industrial Systems, (2026) 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1013075
  3. M.R. Ghori, T.C. Wan, G.C. Sodhy, M. Aljaidi, A. Rizwan, A.S. Sadiq, O. Kaiwartya, Enhancing Reliability and Stability of BLE Mesh Networks: a Multipath Optimized AODV Approach. Sensors, 24(18), (2024) 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24185901
  4. A. Aljarrah, M. Ababneh, M. Karthiga, K. Bhimaavarapu, An Upgraded IoT Based Mobile Ad-hoc Network Enactment Founded on Optimized Signal Strength Based Routing Algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet of Things, 15(1), (2025). https://doi.org/10.54216/JISIoT.150114
  5. G.B.N. Rao, Dynamic Multi-Path Routing Protocol Hinged on Fitness Value using GA in Mobile adhoc networks. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(5), (2024) 2155–2164.
  6. S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, A. Lewis, Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
  7. M.K. Marina, S.R. Das, (2001) On-Demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing in Ad Hoc Networks. In Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Network Protocols. ICNP 2001, IEEE, Riverside, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNP.2001.992756
  8. S.S. Sulaiman, S.S. Naif, B.A. Idrees, A.J. Ahmed, Comparison of Multipath Protocol Improvements in SMMSN-AOMDV and MAN-AOMDV for Stable Node Selection in Ad Hoc Networks. Romanian Journal of Information Technology & Automatic Control/Revista Română de Informatică și Automatică, 35(2), (2025).
  9. H. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, T. Huang, Y. Jiang, Arithmetic optimization AOMDV routing protocol for FANETs. Sensors, 23(17), (2023) 7550. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177550
  10. S. Hameed, Q.A. Minhas, S. Ahmed, A. Nawaz, A. Ali, U. Ullah, EEGW: An Energy-Efficient Grey Wolf Routing Protocol For Fanets. Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences, 16, (2021) https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2021.08.00002
  11. R. Vinodhini, C. Gomathy, A Hybrid Approach for Energy Efficient Routing in WSN: Using DA and GSO Algorithms. In: Smys, S., Bestak, R., Rocha, Á. (eds) Inventive Computation Technologies. ICICIT 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Springer, 98, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33846-6_55
  12. R. Praba, M. Sedhuvignesh, Vishal, Sedhu, Enhanced Hybrid Routing Protocol for Energy-Efficient Multipath Routing in Manets. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(3), (2024) 691–623. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT24103212
  13. Y. Ou, F. Qin, K.-Q. Zhou, P.-F. Yin, L.-P. Mo, A. Mohd Zain, An Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer with Multi-Strategies Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks. Symmetry, 16(3), (2024) 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16030286
  14. Y. Yuting, G. Yuelin, An Adaptive Hybrid Differential Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for WSN Coverage. Cluster Computing, 28, (2025) 229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-024-04856-y
  15. C. Kalaivanan, A. Amer, M. Vennila, J. Giri, M. Dinesh, (2025) Evolution-based Deployment with Efficient Routing and Crow Search Optimization in Internet of Things Application. In 2025 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), IEEE, Erode, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICCS65191.2025.10984488
  16. V. Kumar, S. Singla, S. Arora, S.K. Keshari, S. Kumar, Energy Efficient Optimized Sleep Scheduling Routing Protocol for Enhancement of MANET Lifetime. Wireless Personal Communications, 136(3), (2024) 1849-1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11365-z
  17. V.U. Rathod, S.V. Gumaste, R. Guttula, S. Zade, R.Singh, Optimization of Energy Consumption in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks with a Swarm Intelligence-Based ABC Algorithm. Discover Applied Sciences, 7, (2025) 805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07472-6
  18. N. Ravindran, R.P. Anto Kumar, SECOA: Serial Exponential Coati Optimization Algorithm for MANET Routing with Link Lifetime Prediction. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 59, (2024) 101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101869
  19. M. Zeng, R. Han, Y. Luo, G. Xu, X. Xu, H. Jiang, (2025) SAOMDV: A Fast-Converging Reliability-Enhanced Multipath Routing Method for UANET. In 2025 IEEE 101st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2025-Spring), IEEE, Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTC2025-Spring65109.2025.11174335
  20. P. Satyanarayana, G. Diwakar, V. Priyanka Brahmaiah, S. Marlin, N.V. Phani Sai Kumar, S. Gopalakrishnan, Multi-objective-derived Efficient Energy Saving in Multipath Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with the Modified Aquila–Firefly Heuristic Strategy. Engineering Optimization, 57(9), (2025) 2383–2418. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2024.2399656
  21. F. Qazi, S.A. Khan, F. Hanif, D. Shawar Agha, Efficient Routing Algorithm towards the Security of Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network and Its Applications. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 31(1), (2024) 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10776-023-00613-x
  22. A.A. Naji, M.A. Saeed, A.H. Almagashi, A.M. Ahmed, H.S. Al-Atefi, M.N. Khaled, O.M. Rashed, (2024) Enhancing MANETs Security Against Black Hole Attacks through Time-Based Node Analysis in AOMDV Protocol. In 2024 4th International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA), IEEE, Sana'a, Yemen. https://doi.org/10.1109/eSmarTA62850.2024.10638883
  23. M.J. AL-Mashhadani, K. Karoui, (2025) Rule-Based and AI-Based Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Comparative Review. 7th International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (ICHORA), IEEE, Ankara, Turkiye. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHORA65333.2025.11017238
  24. V. Barbudhe, S.K. Dixit, Energy Optimization of Dynamic Routing Protocol in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network using Energy Efficient Delay Sensitive Technique. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 54(2), (2025) 3392–3408. https://doi.org/10.48047/CU/54/02/3392-3408