Abstract

Languages of the world have certain similar linguistic features in terms of a finite set of fundamental principles which are universal to all languages on one hand, and a finite set of parameters which determine syntactic variability amongst them. In order to substantiate evidence of linguistic universals, there is need for comparative analysis of languages. The thrust of the paper is to expound the diversities and similarities in Ígálá and English linguistic systems in the area of patterns of pluralisation. The paper is hinged on Inferential-realizational theory. The paper observed that the noun class in Ígálá is marked for number through three inflectional markers [ám(á), ìb(ó) and áb(ó)] while the noun class in English is inflected for number by the following exponents: [-s, -es, -ies, -en, -ren, -ves] not losing sight of zero concept. Germane to this work is the fact that Ígálá and English exhibit extended exponence- a linguistic situation where a particular morphosyntactic property could be expressed by more than one morphological marking in the same word depending on the lexeme’s root. Plural markers in Ígálá are prefixes while plural markers in English are suffixes. In conclusion, English and Ígálá are uniform in one specific sense of the capacity to inflect words for grammatical purposes, but have different structures in the process of inflection or associating an inflected word with a specific set of morphosyntactic properties.

Keywords

Pluralisation, Ígálá, Morphosyntactic properties,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Aitchison J., (1996), Cassel’s dictionary of English grammar, London: Cassell & Co.
  2. Attabor, O.T., (2011), A comparative study of inflectional morphologies of English and Ígálá, M.A thesis, Ibadan, University of Ibadan-Nigeria.
  3. Cook, V. J., & Newson, (1996). Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An Introduction (2nd edition),Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  4. Lieber, R., (1992). Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  5. Matthews, P. H., (1972), Inflectional Morphology: a Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation, Cambridge University Press.
  6. Morphosyntactic Property. Available: http://everything2.com/title/morphosyntactic+property
  7. Okpanachi, H., (2002), Ùkọ́chẹ́ íchí Ígálá: An Ígálá language lesson, Ankpa: Cuca Printers.
  8. Omachonu G.S., (2003), Animacy Hierarchy: A Case for Noun Plural Formation in Ígálá, In Atabo S.Y., Onekutu P.M &. Adama E.M.A. (Eds.) Language and Literature in Education for a Better Society. Nsukka: AP Express Publishers 201-208.
  9. Omachonu, G.S., (2008), Inflectional Morphology in Ígálá, Journal of the Linguistic Association of Nigeria, 11, 33-40.
  10. Selkirk, E., (1982), The Syntax of Words. In Linguistic Inquiry Monograph Seven, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  11. Steele, S., (1995), Towards a theory of morphological information, Language, 71: 260-309.
  12. Stump G T., (2001), Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  13. Trask, R. L., (1993), A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics, London: Routledge.