Abstract

The paper proposes that Magahi, a modern Indo-Aryan language, presents the phenomenon of multiple determiners in the syntax of modification and argues that the phenomenon is not a simple case of agreement in definiteness in the noun phrase whereby the additional determiner carries a similar semantic feature. I present examples that contest the possibility of it as a case of concord or agree. For the semantic motivation of the phenomenon, following Plank (2003) & Kumar (2020), the paper claims that the definite determiner /-wa/ in Magahi is not an exclusively dedicated definiteness morpheme, and therefore, the language needs an additional linguistic element. I claim that the additional determiner weakens the definiteness of the definite determiner /-wa/, creating a projection problem in the overall referentiality of the NP. By further describing the individual semantics of the determiner on the noun and the adjective, the paper claims that the determiner on the adjective exudes the semantics of specificity that can co-occur with the numeral. However, the determiner on the noun has the semantics of familiarity or identifiability. The paper further provides an exhaustive account of semantic and structural description and motivation of the phenomenon.

Keywords

Multiple determiners Definiteness Agreement Noun phrase Indo-Aryan Magahi

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
  2. Adams, K. L., & Conklin, N. F. (1973, April). Toward a theory of natural classification. In Paper from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 1-10).
  3. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices: A typology of noun categorization devices. OUP Oxford.
  4. Alexiadou, A., & Wilder, C. (1998). Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the DP, 303-332.
  5. Alexiadou, A. (2014). Multiple determiners and the structure of DPs (Vol. 211). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.211
  6. Alok, D., (2014). The Morpho-Syntax of Nominal particle-wa. Indian Linguistics, 75(3-4), pp.39-44.
  7. Aryani, S., (1965). Magahi VyaakaraNa Kosh.
  8. Barker, C. (2004). Paraphrase is not enough. Theoretical linguistics, 29(3), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.29.3.201
  9. Bhattacharya, T. (2016). Inner/outer politeness in central Māgadhan Prākrit languages: Agree as labeling. Linguistic Analysis, 40, 3-4.
  10. Bolinger, D. (1967). Adjectives in English: attribution and predication. Lingua, 18, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6
  11. Borer, H., (2005). In name only (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press on Demand.
  12. Campos, H., & Stavrou, M. (2004). Polydefinite constructions in Modern Greek and Aromanian. Balkan syntax and semantics, 67, 137. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.67.09cam
  13. Cheng, L. L. S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic inquiry, 30(4), 509-542.
  14. Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across language. Natural language semantics, 6(4), 339-405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506
  15. Chierchia, G. (2000). Chinese conditionals and the theory of conditionals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9(1), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008317108361
  16. Chomsky, N., (2001). Derivation by phase. Kenstowicz, M.(ed.), Ken Hale. A life in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  17. Cinque, G. (2010). The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study (Vol. 57). MIT press.
  18. Denny, J. P. (1986). The semantic role of noun classifiers. Noun classes and categorization, 297-308. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.7.19den
  19. Dixon, R. M. (2010). Basic linguistic theory volume 2: Grammatical topics (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press on Demand.
  20. Giannakidou, A., & Stavrou, M. (1999). Nominalization and ellipsis in the Greek DP. The Linguistic Review, 16(4), 295-332. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1999.16.4.295
  21. Grierson, G. A. (1903). Linguistic survey of India (Vol. 5, Part 2: Indo-Aryan family, eastern group, Specimens of the Bihari and Oriya languages). Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent, Government Printing House India.
  22. Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 274-307.
  23. Halle, M., Marantz, A., Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. 1993, 111-176.
  24. Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic inquiry, 16(4), 547-593.
  25. Horrocks, G., & Stavrou, M. (1987). Bounding theory and Greek syntax: Evidence for wh-movement in NP. Journal of linguistics, 79-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001104X
  26. Ihsane, T., & Puskás, G. (2001). Specific is not definite. GG@ G, 2, 39-54.
  27. Julien, M. (2005). Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. J. Benjamins Pub.
  28. Kayne, R. S., & Kayne, R. S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax (Vol. 25). MIT press.
  29. Kolliakou, D. (2004). Monadic definites and polydefinites: their form, meaning and use. Journal of linguistics, 263-323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002531
  30. Krifka, M. (1995). 11 COMMON NOUNS: A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF CHINESE AND ENGLISH. The generic book, 398.
  31. Kumar, C. (2018). Plurality in Magahi Language and Reference to count/mass Noun. Language in India, 18(3).
  32. Kumar, C. (2020). Typology of Nominal Modifiers in major Languages of Bihar: Magahi, Bhojpuri, Maithili, Angika & Bajjika (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University).
  33. Levi, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals (p. 27). New York: Academic Press.
  34. Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic inquiry, 609-665.
  35. Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge University Press.
  36. Mackenzie, I. E. (2019). DP Structure: From Multiple Determiners to Just One. In Language Structure, Variation and Change (pp. 123-161). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  37. Payne, T. E., & Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Plank, F. (Ed.). (2003). Noun phrase structure in the languages of Europe (Vol. 7). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197075
  39. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Noyes, C. R. (1996). Context availability and the development of word reading skill. Journal of Literacy Research, 28(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969609547909
  40. Simpson, A., & Biswas, P. (2016). Bare nominals, classifiers, and the representation of definiteness in Bangla. Linguistic Analysis, 40(3-4), 167-198.
  41. Simpson, A. (2017). Bare classifier/noun alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) variety of Chinese and the encoding of definiteness. Linguistics, 55(2), 305-331. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0041
  42. Sproat, S. (1988). R. S proat, C h. S hi h. Prenominal Adjectival Ordering in English and Mandarin. NELS, 18(1988), 465-489.
  43. Sproat, R., & Shih, C. (1991). The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Interdisciplinary approaches to language (pp. 565-593). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3818-5_30
  44. Stavrou, M. (1996). Adjectives in Modern Greek: an instance of predication, or an old issue revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 79-112.
  45. Szabolcsi, A. (1986). From the definiteness effect to lexical integrity. Topic, focus, and configurationality, 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.4.15sza
  46. Szabolcsi, A., (1987). Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Approaches to Hungarian 2: Theories and analyses (pp. 167-191). József Attila University.
  47. Taylor, John R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  48. Tsakali, V., (2008). Similarities in the interpretation of doubling constructions. In Meeting of the Department of Linguistics of the University of Thessaloniki.
  49. Verma, S., (2003). Magahi. The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp.498-514.
  50. Yadav, R., (1996). A reference grammar of Maithili. Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811698