Nominalization is a linguistic process of deriving nouns from other word classes or linguistic units. Nominalization is evident in many languages of the world. The Tiv language also exhibits nominalization. This paper critically analyses nominalization in Tiv. The objectives of the paper are: to determine the processes through which nominalization takes place in the Tiv language, the extent to which the processes of nominalization are productive in the Tiv language, and the classes of words and linguistic units that are nominalized in Tiv. Data were sourced from the native speakers of Tiv using the researcher – participant technique. The researchers documented the lexical items used during the interaction, determine the basic components of the lexical items and the word classes such lexical items belonged to. The intuitive knowledge of the researchers as the native speakers of the language was harnessed. The secondary data were sourced from the already existing literatures such as textbooks, journals and the internet. The theory adopted in the paper is Hokett’s (1954) structural theory whose models are the Item-and-Process (I.P) and Item-and-Arrangement (I.P). It has been found out that the processes through which nominalization takes in the Tiv language are prefixation, prefixation plus some modifications, tonality and desententialization (sentence deconstruction). These processes are discovered to be very productive in nominalization in Tiv. It has also been found out that verbs roots and adjectives are the classes of words that are nominalized (lexical nominalization) in the Tiv language together with sentences (syntactic nominalization).


Nominalization Nominalizer Prefixation Modification Tonality and Desententialization


  1. Ajim, S.S., (2018). Analysis of derivational processes in Tiv morphology. M.A Dissertation submitted to postgraduate school, Benue State University, Makurdi.
  2. Anyanwu, O., Omego, C., (2015). Aspects of deverbal nominalization in Tee. In selected proceedings of the 44th Annual conference on African Linguistics, ed. Ruth Kramer et al 1-10, Somerville, M.A
  3. Badejo, B.R., (2014). Morphology: an introduction to the theory of word structure, Cambridge University Press, England.
  4. Chomsky, N., (1968). Remarks on nominalization. In Roderic, J. & Peter, S. (1970) (ed). Readings in English transformational grammar, Mussachusetts Ginn company, Waltham.
  5. Dauda, M.B., (1971). Lexicalist hypothesis and Hausa, In studies in African Linguistics, 2(3) 197-216.
  6. Haspelmath, M. & Sims, A. (2010). Understanding Morphology (2nd edition), Hodder Education, London.
  7. Hockett, C.F. Two models of grammatical description of words, Word, 10 (1954) 210 – 234.
  8. Ikoro, S., (1990). The development and modernization of the Ogoni (Kegboid). Languages for Ogoni unity. Unpublished paper offer to the National Union of Ogoni students, University of Port Harcourt chapter.
  9. Maduagwu, G.O., (2010) Aspects of nominal derivation in Igbo, Nigerian Journal of Research and Production, 16(1) 1-16.
  10. Matthews, P.H., (1974). Morphology: an introduction to the theory of word structure. Cambridge University Press, England.
  11. Maxwell, M.B., (1998). Two theories of morphology, one implementation. SIL electronic working paper. SIL International Publications.
  12. Shibafani, M. & Awadh, K.M., (2009). Nominalization in Soqotri, a south Arabian Language of Yemen. In Leo, W. Wetzels (ed). The linguistics of endangered languages – contribution to morphology and morpho-syntax, 9 – 31. Brill, Leiden.
  13. Spencer, A., (1991). Morphological theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Wiley, New York, USA.
  14. Yule, G., (1996). The study of language. Cambridge University Press, UK.