Abstract

Despite the abundance of studies on learners' beliefs in the field of second language acquisition, very few have addressed learners' conceptions of the language itself. In this article, we argue that examining these conceptions is crucial for understanding the beliefs and attitudes students hold towards other languages and their learning processes. Specifically, we observe how a prescriptive view of language can influence students' expectations regarding the nature of the content being learned. Additionally, we note that the notion of correctness is often imprecise and ambiguous within the educational context. Furthermore, we explore how learners' conceptions about language components are intricately linked to their expectations about language learning. In particular, we observe that an emphasis on words as the primary object of learning can be detrimental to sociopragmatic factors. Moreover, we note that the folk conception of meaning as a rigid and context-independent entity can lead to a naïve universalist perspective, privileging the L1 as a means to understand and evaluate the L2. To delve into learners' conceptions of language, we propose the use of qualitative methods grounded in folk linguistics. Folk linguistics is the study of non-linguists' beliefs and ideas about language and language learning, including how they perceive and describe language use.  This approach involves the study of metalanguage through discoursal data, which can be gathered both through metacognitive and contextual approaches. Additionally, we suggest that understanding the folklinguistic notions held by educators and those embedded in teaching materials is significant in this line of research, as it can help in designing and implementing educational interventions that are more closely aligned with learners' pre-existing conceptions, potentially leading to improved learning outcomes.

Keywords

Second Language Acquisition, Learners' Beliefs, Folk Linguistics, Applied Linguistics,

References

  1. Abdi, H., & Asadi, B. (2015). A synopsis of researches on teachers’ and students’ beliefs about language learning. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(4), 104-114.
  2. Ahangari, S., & Dogolsara, S.A. (2015). Comparing the Effect of Using Monolingual versus Bilingual Dictionary on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. English Language Teaching, 8(6), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p141
  3. Albury, N.J. (2014). Introducing the folk linguistics of language policy. International Journal of Language Studies, 8(3), 85-106.
  4. Amuzie, G.L., & Winke, P. (2009). Changes in language learning beliefs as a result of study abroad. System, 37(3), 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.011
  5. Badiola González, J. (2020). Actitudes hacia las variedades diatópicas del español en Praga. In Perfiles, factores y contextos en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de ELE/EL2, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
  6. Barcelos, A.M.F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches, 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_1
  7. Baronas, R.L., & Cox, M.I.P. (2020). Linguística popular/folk linguistics e linguística científica: Em vez do versus, propomos a integração. Fórum Linguístico, 16(4), 4254-4256. https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2019v16n4p4254
  8. Baronas, R.L., Gonçalves, M.R.B., & Azevedo, E. (2023). Is Folk Linguistics counter-hegemonic?. Fórum Linguístico, 20(3), 9420-9432. https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2023.e95226
  9. Benson, P., & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00045-7
  10. Bui, H.P., & Huong, L.P. H. (2023). Students’ and Teachers’ Beliefs About Effective Teaching of English for Occupational Purposes. Sage Open, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231153076
  11. Dilek, Y., & Yürük, N. (2013). Using semantic mapping technique in vocabulary teaching at pre-intermediate level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1531-1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.220
  12. Dolar, K. (2018). Les dictionnaires collaboratifs en ligne, des objets métalinguistiques profanes. Les Carnets du Cediscor. Publication du Centre de recherches sur la didacticité des discours ordinaires, (14), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.4000/cediscor.1161
  13. Fernández de Molina, E., & Hernández-Campoy, J. M. (2018). Geographic varieties of Spanish. The Cambridge handbook of hispanic linguistics,Cambridge University Press 496-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779194.024
  14. Flores Mejía, E. (2014). Actitudes lingüísticas en Ecuador. Una tradición normativa que subsiste. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 5. https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v5i0.683
  15. Gilakjani, A.P., & Sabouri, N.B. (2017). Teachers' Beliefs in English Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p78
  16. Heyd, T. (2014). Folk-linguistic landscapes: The visual semiotics of digital enregisterment. Language in Society, 43(5), 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000530
  17. Horwitz, E.K. 1987. Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In Learner strategies in language learning, Prentice Hall, New York.
  18. Jara Murillo, C.V. (2008). Lingüística popular: el español de Costa Rica según los ticos y algunos centroamericanos residentes en el país. Revista internacional de lingüística iberoamericana, 6(1) (11), 55-99.
  19. Jones, N., Barnes, A., & Hunt, M. (2005). Thinking through languages: A multi-lingual approach to primary school languages. Language learning journal, 32(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739085200201
  20. Joyce, P. (2018). L2 vocabulary learning and testing: The use of L1 translation versus L2 definition. The Language Learning Journal, 46(3), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1028088
  21. Kalaja, P. (1995). Student beliefs (or metacognitive knowledge) about SLA reconsidered. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1995.tb00080.x
  22. Kalaja, P. (2003). Research on students’ beliefs about SLA within a discursive approach. Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches, 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_4
  23. Kuntz, P. S. (1996). Beliefs about Language Learning: The Horwitz Model. ERIC Document No. ED 397 649.
  24. Liu, J. (2008). L1 Use in L2 Vocabulary Learning: Facilitator or Barrier. International education studies, 1(2), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v1n2p65
  25. Lukac, M. (2018). Grassroots prescriptivism. LOT, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
  26. Mendoza Puertas, J. D. (2021). Prestigio y variedades geográficas en la enseñanza de ELE. Un acercamiento a las creencias y actitudes lingüísticas de los universitarios taiwaneses. Tonos Digital, 40.
  27. Miller, L., & Ginsberg, R. B. (1995). Folklinguistic theories of language learning. Second language acquisition in a study abroad context, 9, 293-316. https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.9.18mil
  28. Mohammadi, M., Birjandi, P., & Maftoon, P. (2015). Learning strategy training and the shift in learners’ beliefs about language learning: A reading comprehension context. Sage Open, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015579726
  29. Niedzielski, N.A., & Preston, D.R. (2003). Folk linguistics. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
  30. O’Keefe, P.A., Lee, H.Y., & Chen, P. (2021). Changing students’ beliefs about learning can unveil their potential. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220984173
  31. Pasquale, M. (2011). Folk beliefs about second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 24(1), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24.07pas
  32. Pasquale, M. (2013). Folk linguistics, content-oriented discourse analysis, and language teacher beliefs. In Christian Faith and English Language Teaching and Learning, Routledge.
  33. Pasquale, M.D., & Preston, D.R. (2013). The folk linguistics of language teaching and learning. In Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Second Language Learning and Teaching: Studies in Honor of Waldemar Marton, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23547-4_10
  34. Paveau, M., & Esteves, P.M. (2018). Não linguistas fazem linguística? Uma abordagem antieliminativa das ideias populares. Policromias-Revista de Estudos do Discurso, Imagem e Som, 3(2), 21-45.
  35. Pellet, S., & Myers, L. (2022). What’s wrong with “What is your name?”>“Quel est votre nom?”: Teaching responsible use of MT through discursive competence and metalanguage awareness. L2 Journal an Open Access Refereed Journal for World Language Educators, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/L214151739
  36. Preston, D.R. (1996). Whaddayaknow?: The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language awareness, 5(1), 40-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890
  37. Preston, D.R. (2004). Folk metalanguage. Language Power and Social Process, 11, 75-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377.75
  38. Preston, D.R. (2011). Methods in (applied) folk linguistics: Getting into the minds of the folk. AILA Review, 24(1), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24.02pre
  39. Preston, D.R. (2017). Folk linguistics and language awareness. The Routledge handbook of language awareness, Routledge, 375-386. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676494-23
  40. Ryan, J., & Forrest, L. (2021). ‘No chance to speak’: Developing a pedagogical response to turn-taking problems. Innovation in language learning and teaching, 15(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1687709
  41. Santipolo, M. (2016). Folk linguistics and language teaching education. A case study in an Italian secondary school. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(3), 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1068788
  42. Seuren, P. A. (2013). From Whorf to Montague: Explorations in the theory of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682195.001.0001
  43. Stegu, M., Preston, D. R., Wilton, A., & Finkbeiner, C. (2018). Panel discussion: language awareness vs. folk linguistics vs. applied linguistics. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1434921
  44. Svetozarovová, R. (2019). Actitudes y creencias de estudiantes eslovacos hacia variedades cultas del español. VERBEIA. Revista De Estudios Filológicos. Journal of English and Spanish Studies, 5(4), 124-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1434921
  45. Wierzbicka, A. (2013). Kinship and social cognition in Australian languages: Kayardild and Pitjantjatjara. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(3), 302-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2013.846458
  46. Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Imprisoned in English: the Hazards of English as a Default Language. University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199321490.001.0001
  47. Wilton, A., & Stegu, M. (2011). Bringing the ‘folk’into applied linguistics: An introduction. AILA Review, 24(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.24.01wil
  48. Wong, L., & Esler, J. (2020). A review of teaching and learning linguistic politeness. Journal of Critical Studies in Language and Literature, 1(4), 13-21 https://doi.org/10.46809/jcsll.v1i4.38 .
  49. Yates, L. (2010). Pragmatic challenges for second language learners. Pragmatics across languages and cultures, 7, 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214444.2.287
  50. Zhong, Q. (2015). The nature of language learners’ beliefs: A half-told story. International Journal of English Studies, 15(2), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/2/220061