Abstract

There are greater possibilities for a language utterance to have more meanings than what is stated. It is also possible for the hearers/audience to interpret what the speaker has in mind beyond what the speaker has put out in words. These meanings derived in this form are echoic and they are arrived at by choosing meanings that contextually relevant involving the least effort. How echoic relevant definitions are achieved has been studied using different language instances. Still, none in the researchers' knowledge has investigated how the COVID 19 social media memes, as used by Nigerians, communicate deeper meanings that are contextually relevant and how the echoic interpretations reveal the users' attitude. On this basis, therefore, the present study investigated the echoic nature of COVID 19 related social media memes as used by Nigerians. The study used Sperber and Wilson (1986) relevance theory as the theoretical framework and qualitatively analyzed Ten (10) purposefully selected memes. In the end, the study found out that interpretations of memes are significantly linked with the shared cognitive background knowledge which the speaker/meme creator and the hearer/audience have. Also, memes could echo the attitude of concern, disdain and fear while also harboring deeper meanings that contextually relevant and implicit.

Keywords

COVID 19, Memes, Relevance, Communication, Pragmatics, Echoic,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Alfaki, I. and Siddiek, A. (2013), The role of background knowledge in enhancing reading comprehension, World Journal of English Language, 3, 42-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v3n4p42
  2. Attardo, S. (2000), Irony as relevant inappropriateness, Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 793-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3
  3. Attias, C. (2017), Memes 101: what they are & how to use them, https://www.wix.com/blog/2017/07/what-are-memes Accessed 8 April, 2020.
  4. Bryant, G. (2012), Is verbal irony special?, Language and Linguistics Compass, 6: 11, = 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.364
  5. Denzi, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2011), SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Dortmund: SAGE Publications.
  6. Grice, H. (1978). Further Notes on Logic and Conversation, Syntax and Semantics Pragmatics, 9: 113 – 127.
  7. Halliday, M. (1985), Introduction to functional grammar, London: Edward Arnold.
  8. Halliday, M. (1989), ‘Language and social meaning’, International Conference on Humanities, historical and social sciences IPED, Singapore: IACSIT Press.
  9. Halliday, M. and Matthiessen, C. (2004), An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd ed, London: Edward Arnold.
  10. Hamamoto, H. (1998), Irony from a cognitive perspective In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 257–270.
  11. Holmes, J. (2008), An Introduction to sociolinguistics, London: Longman.
  12. Idegbekwe, D. and Kpuduwei, A. (2018), Shared background knowledge as a prerequisite for ironic communication: An insight from Barack Obama’s speech: Obama Out, The Journal of Communicative English, 18, 81-88.
  13. Idegbekwe, D., and Nwala, M. (2016), Positive face strategies used in insurgency conversation: A focus on the PDP and the APC, Ikoku, 5:1, 44-49.
  14. Konnikova, M. (2013), The psychology of online comments, The New Yorker, https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/the-psychology-of-online-comment Accessed 9th April, 2020.
  15. Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Elosúa de Juan, M., Gygax, P., Madden, C., and Mosquera Roa, S. (2015), Reading between the lines: The activation of embodied background knowledge during text comprehension, Pragmatics and Cognition, 5:11, pp. 211-241. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.03mar
  16. Martin, J. and White, P. (2005) The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Nazir, K. (2020), Semantics and pragmatics the relevance theory, https://www.slideshare.net/kirannazir1/the-relevance-theory-pragmatics Accessed 8 April, 2020.
  18. Olugbile, F. (2020), ‘Covid-19 and the Nigerian nation: An overview of the ongoing pandemic, the local response, and prospects for the future’, Business Day Newspaper of 6th April, 2020, https://businessday.ng/coronavirus/article/covid-19-and-the-nigerian-nation-an-overview-of-the-ongoingpandemic-the-local-response-and-prospects-for-the-future/ Accessed 8 April, 2020.
  19. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986), Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  20. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1998), Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi In Carston, R. & Uchida, S. (eds.) Relevance theory: Applications and implications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 283-293.
  21. Stanel, T. (2006), Linguistic approaches to irony: An analysis of British newspaper comments. An unpublished Masters project of the linguistics department of Chemnitz University Technology.
  22. Umera-Okeke, N. and Idegbekwe, D. (2018), A sociolinguistic analysis of selected Pentecostal proper names in Nigeria, The crab, 13, pp.83-93.
  23. Wilson, D. (2016), Relevance Theory, in.Y. Huang (ed), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 343-386. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25
  24. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (1995), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Cambridge: Blackwell.
  25. Yamanashi, M. (1998), Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes In R. Carston & S.Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 271–281.
  26. Yus, F. (2008), Relevance Theory, https://personal.ua.es/francisco.yus/site/ELL2.pdf Accessed 8 April, 2020.
  27. Zhang, K. and Kizilcec, R. (2014), Anonymity in social media: effects of content controversiality and social endorsement on sharing behavior, Conference’, Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media