Abstract

Elections in Nigeria, as is also obtainable in other countries of the world are characterized by a unique use of linguistic creativity and language codification during campaigns. This is made possible by the different campaign mechanisms employed by different political bodies to market their candidates and as well, de-market candidates of rival political parties. The campaigns preceding the 2023 general elections in Nigeria provide us with a set of unique and creatively inspired texts. The main objective of this study is to understudy the socio-pragmatic content of these texts which manifest mostly as neologisms. The data for this study were elicited using ethnographic approaches and were descriptively analyzed using the principles of post-colonial pragmatics by Anchimbe and Janney (2011,) and Stalnaker’s (2002) common ground notion. Findings indicate that although some of the neologisms used in the 2023 general elections were completely new, some were recycled from previous electioneering periods. The neologisms were basically employed as means of showing intra party and inter party or group identities.

Keywords

Common Ground Theory, 2023 Elections, Neologisms, Political Language, Post-Colonial Pragmatics,

References

  1. Adeola, A. & Muhyideen, I. (2020). Coinages and slogans as strategies for identity construction in the 2019 general elections in Nigeria. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v1i1.11
  2. Allan, K. (2012). Referring to 'what counts as the referent': a view from linguistics. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, Springer Verlag, Milan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_10
  3. Ameer Hadi, S.A. & AL-Majdawi, A.M.G. (2019). The Significance of Political Neologisms. Journal of the College of Education, 2(37), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.31185/eduj.Vol2.Iss37.1107
  4. Anchimbe, E.A. & Janney, R.W. (2011). Postcolonial pragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1451-1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.027
  5. Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum, London.
  6. Chilton, P. & Schäffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. Discourse as social interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Sage Publications, 206-230.
  7. Diedrichsen, E. (2022). Common Ground in Linguistic Theory and Internet Pragmatics: Forms of Dynamic Multicultural Interaction. The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, 245 – 273. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884303.011
  8. Ekwelibe, R. (2015). Socio-pragmatic competence in English as a Second Language (ESL). Humanities and Socio Sciences Journal, 10(2), 88-99.
  9. European Union Election Observation Mission to Nigeria Final Report (2023). EU Election Observation Mission General Elections. European Union Election Observation Mission to Nigeria Final Report. https://www.eods.eu/library/EU%20EOM%20NGA%202023%20FR.pdf
  10. Ezeifeka, C.R.A. (2018). Neologisms and Nonce Expressions of Ethnic Politics in Nigeria’s “Change” Regime. Ogirisi: a new journal of African studies, 14. https://doi.org/10.4314/og.v14i1.1
  11. Fatimayin, F. (2021). Nigerian English Usage: Users’ Socio-pragmatic Perspective. Dutsinma Journal of English and Literature, 1-17.
  12. Ishola, S.J. (2024). What does the name Jagaban means and why is it attributed to Tinubu?. Atlanticride Blog.
  13. Kperogi, F. (2021). With Kyari Out, Tinubu Can Now Sleepwalk Into Power. Njenje Media News.
  14. Kperogi, F. (2023). Why Northerners don’t call Tinubu ‘Jagaban’. Columns, Nigerian Tribune.
  15. Lehrer, A. (2003). Understanding Trendy Neologisms. In Italian Journal of Linguistics, Rivista di Linguistica, 15(2), 369-382.
  16. Lotfy, H. (2017).The impact of politics on lexical coinage: A study of the morphological patterns in Egyptian printed media after January, 25th 2011. The American University in Cairo. AUC Knowledge Fountain.
  17. McNair, B. (1995). An Introduction to Political Communication. Routledge, London.
  18. Mensah, E.O., Nzuanke, S.F. & Adejumo, T. (2022) Giving a dog a bad name: The strategic use of labelling in contemporary Nigerian political discourse. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 48(2), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2022.2091628
  19. Mohamed, J.M.G. (2015). Productivity of the –iyya Implications for translation and modernization of vocabulary. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special issue on translation, 4, 234-252.
  20. Odusanya, R. (2022). New-neologism: ‘Emi lokan’, ‘Eleyi’ and ‘Olule’. Opinion Nigeria.
  21. Ofoegbu, C.O. & Usar, I.I. (2018). A Morpho-Semantic Analysis of Lexical Creativity of Political Speech of Nigeria’s Independence Anniversary 2015. Journal of Linguistics, Language and Igbo Studies, 2(1), 112-131.
  22. Patrick, K.O & Emezue, G.I.N (2021). Pragmatic analysis of social media hashtags: Insights from #ENDSARS protests in Nigeria. UJOLL: Uturu Journal of Languages and Linguistics, 1(2), 141-158.
  23. Patrick, K.O., Ofoha, U.N., Onyegbule, E.S., & Osondu, A.S. (2022). Language of Politics in Multilingual and Multi-Ethnic Nations: The Nigerian Example. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6), 110-116.
  24. Rey, A. (1995). Essay on terminology. John Benjamin Publishing, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.9
  25. Spencer-Oatey, H. & Kotthoff, H. (2009). Introduction. Handbook of Intercultural Communication, De Gruyter, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511_1
  26. Stalnaker, R.C. (1974). Pragmatic presupposition. Semantics and Philosophy, New York University Press, New York.
  27. Stalnaker, R.C. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 701-721. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902
  28. Stekauer, P. (2002). On the theory of neologisms and nonce-formations. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600120122571
  29. Ugwu, E.N. & Ekundayo, S.B.O. (2013). Nicknaming as a Morphological and Lexicosemantic Process: Implication for Language Learning and Teaching European Scientific Journal, 9(5), 1-14.
  30. Uwen, G.O. & Ellah, S.M (2022). Plandemic” and “Hunger Virus”: A Morpho-pragmatic Study of Coronavirus Related Neologisms. In Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies (JOLLS), 11(1).
  31. Van Dijk, T.A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 466-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch22
  32. Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
  33. Zailani, A.A. (2019). Coinage and Neologism in Hausa Political Programs: A Sociolinguistics Perspective. Register Journal, 12(2), 238-252. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v12i2.294-311