Influence of Additives on the Fatigue Life and Stiffness of Asphalt Concrete

Saad I. Sarsam
Sarsam and Associates Consult Bureau (SACB), Baghdad-IRAQ

Dimensions

Plum Analytics

Abstract

Implementation of additives to the asphalt binder can enhance the overall physical properties of the modified asphalt concrete. In the present assessment, an attempt has been made to use 2 % of silica fumes and 4 % of fly ash class F for modification of asphalt binder in wet process. Asphalt concrete wearing course mixtures have been prepared and compacted by roller in the laboratory. The beam specimens of 400 mm length and 50 mm height and 63 mm width were extracted from the slab samples. The specimens were subjected to the four-point repeated flexural bending beam test. The flexural stiffness was calculated under three constant micro strain levels of (250, 400, and 750). The fatigue life was monitored in terms the number of load repetitions to reach the required reduction in stiffness. It was concluded that the flexural stiffness increases by (11, and 15) %, (17.7, and 63.6) %, (57.2, and 65) % when 2% of silica fumes or 4 % of fly ash are implemented and the specimen’s practices 750, 400, and 250 microstrain levels respectively. However, the fatigue life of asphalt concrete beam specimens increases by (40, and 72.8) %, (115, and 220.6) %, (46, and 94.6) % when 2% of silica fumes or 4 % of fly ash are implemented and the specimen’s practices 750, 400, and 250 microstrain levels respectively. It is recommended to use modified binder with fly ash and silica fumes in asphalt concrete to enhance the fatigue life and stiffness.

Keywords

  • Asphalt concrete,
  • Flexural Stiffness,
  • Fatigue life,
  • Silica Fumes,
  • Fly ash

References

  1. S. Adhikari, Z. You, Fatigue Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement using Beam Fatigue Apparatus, The Technology Interface Journal/Spring, 10 (2010).
  2. V.B. Kakade, M.A. Reddy, K.S. Reddy, Rutting performance of hydrated lime modified bituminous mixes, Construction and Building Materials, 186 (2018) 1–10.
  3. A. Al-Mohammedawi, K. Mollenhauer, A Study on the Influence of the Chemical Nature of Fillers on Rheological and Fatigue Behavior of Bitumen Emulsion Mastic, Materials, 13 (2020) 4627.
  4. D. Lesueur, A. Teixeira, M.M. Lázaro, D. Andaluz, A. Ruiz, A simple test method in order to assess the effect of mineral fillers on bitumen ageing, Construction and Building Materials, 117 (2016) 182–189.
  5. P. Buczy´ nski, M. Iwa´ nski, Inactive Mineral Filler as a Stiffness Modulus Regulator in Foamed Bitumen-Modified Recycled Base Layers, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245 (2017) 032042.
  6. B.S. Underwood, Y.R. Kim, Experimental investigation into the multiscale behavior of asphalt concrete, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12, (2011) 357–370.
  7. A. A. Khan, N. Ullah, A. Ahmad, S. Ali, Evaluation of mechanical properties of hot mix asphalt by replacing the combination of marble dust and silica fume as a filler, Global Scientific Journals, 8 (2020) 681-690.
  8. R. Ullah, I. Hafeez, S. Zaidi, Jamal, S. Safeer Haider, Study the Effect of Substitution Filler on performance of Asphalt Mixture, Civil Engineering Journal, 6 (2020).
  9. H. Bahia, D. I. Hanson, M. Zeng, H. Zhai, M. Khatri, R. Anderson, (2001) Characterization of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design, National Technical Reports Library.
  10. J. Wang, M. Guo, Y. Tan, Study on application of cement substituting mineral fillers in asphalt mixture, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 7 (2018) 189–198.
  11. S.I. Sarsam, Influence of Aging, Temperature and Moisture Damage on the Stiffness of Asphalt Concrete through the Fatigue Process, International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge, 4 (2016) 077-084
  12. S.I. Sarsam, A.K. AL-Lamy, Fatigue life assessment of Modified Asphalt Concrete, International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge, 3 (2015) 030-041.
  13. ASTM, Road and Paving Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.03, American Society for Testing and Materials, (2015) West Conshohocken, USA.
  14. SCRB, State Commission of Roads and Bridges, Standard Specification for Roads & Bridges, (2003) Ministry of Housing & Construction, Iraq.
  15. AASHTO, R-30, Standard Practice for Mixture Conditioning of Hot Mix Asphalt, AASHTO Provisional Standards. (2002) Washington, D.C.
  16. S.I. Sarsam, A.K. AL-Lamy, Fatigue Behavior of Modified Asphalt Concrete Pavement, Journal of Engineering, 22 (2016) 1-10.
  17. EN 12697 – 33. Bituminous Mixtures – Test Methods for Hot Mix Asphalt – part 33: Specimen prepared by Roller Compactor, (2007) European Committee for Standardization.
  18. AASHTO T-321, (2010) Standard Method of Test for Determining the Fatigue Life of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Subjected to Repeated Flexural Bending, AASHTO Provisional Standards, Washington, D.C.

Downloads

PDF

Article Details

Volume 3, Issue 6, Year 2021

Published 2021-10-16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Sarsam, S. I. (2021). Influence of Additives on the Fatigue Life and Stiffness of Asphalt Concrete. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation, 3(6), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.54392/irjmt2162

Plum Analytics