IRJMT invites application for new board members (Should have more than 15 Scopus H index)

The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in STEM Higher Education: A Critical Review

Bharath Kumar Nagaraj
Revature LLC, Reston, Virginia, 20190, USA
Kalaivani A
Department of Physics, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore-641407, Tamil Nadu, India
Suraj Begum R
Department of Science and Humanities, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore-641008, Tamil Nadu, India
Akila S
Department of Physical Education and Sports, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur-610005, Tamil Nadu, India
Hemant Kumar Sachdev
Department of Computer Science and Engineering (AIML), KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore-641407, Tamil Nadu, India
Senthil Kumar N
PG and Research Department of Physics, Kongunadu Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India


Plum Analytics


Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a disruptive force with the potential to transform various industries, and the field of higher education is no exception. This critical review paper aims to examine the emerging role of AI in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) higher education. The article explores the impact of AI on teaching and learning methodologies, curriculum design, student engagement, assessment practices, and institutional strategies. The review also highlights the potential benefits and challenges associated with integrating AI into STEM education and identify key areas for future research and development. Overall, this article provides insights into how AI can revolutionize STEM higher education and offers recommendations for harnessing its full potential.


  • Artificial Intelligence,
  • STEM Education,
  • Higher Education,
  • Teaching and Learning


  1. Luan, Hui, Chin-Chung Tsai. A Review of Using Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Education, Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), (2021) 250-266.
  2. O. Zawacki-Richter, V.I. Marín, M. Bond, F. Gouverneur, Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (1), (2019) 1-27.
  3. F. Tahiru, AI in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 23(1) (2021) 1- 20.
  4. S. Chauhan, A meta-analysis of the impact of technology on learning effectiveness of elementary students, Computers & Education, 105 (2017) 14-30,
  5. Ke Zhang, A.B. Aslan, AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 2021, 100025.
  6. N. Goagoses, T. Suovuo, H. Winschiers- Theophilus, C.S. Montero, N. Pope, Erkki Rötkönen & Erkki Sutinen, A systematic review of social classroom climate in online and technology-enhanced learning environments in primary and secondary school. Education and Information Technologies, (2023).
  7. Thomas K.F. Chiu, Qi Xia, Xinyan Zhou, Ching Sing Chai, Miaoting Cheng, Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 2023,
  8. Celik, M. Dindar, H. Muukkonen, S. Jarvela, The Promises and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence for Teachers: a Systematic Review of Research. TechTrends, 66 (2022) 616–630.
  9. L. Guo, D. Wang, F. Gu, Y. Li, Y. Wang, R. Zhou, Evolution and trends in intelligent tutoring systems research: a multidisciplinary and scientometric view. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3) (2021) 441–61.
  10. A. Nguyen, H.N. Ngo, Y. Hong, Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Educ Inf Technol, 28, 4221–4241 (2023).
  11. R. Baker, G. Siemens, (2014). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. Cambridge University Press.
  12. Chong Guan, Jian Mou, Zhiying Jiang, Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty- year data-driven historical analysis, International Journal of Innovation Studies, 4(4), (2020) 134-147.
  13. R.A. Beghetto, (2019). Large-Scale Assessments, Personalized Learning, and Creativity: Paradoxes and Possibilities. ECNU Review of Education, 2(3), 311–327.
  14. K. VanLEHN (2011) The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems, Educational Psychologist, 46:4, 197-221,
  15. Abu-Naser, S. Samy, Evaluating the Effectiveness of the CPP-Tutor, an Intelligent Tutoring System for Students Learning to Program in C++. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 5(1) (2009) 109-114.
  16. A. Sapriati, A.D.J. Suhandoko, A. Yundayani, R.A. Karim, U. Kusmawan, Mohd Adnan, A.H.; Suhandoko, A.A. The Effect of Virtual Laboratories on Improving Students’ SRL: An Umbrella Systematic Review. Education sciences, 13, (2023) 222.
  17. P. Blikstein, M. Worsley, (2013). Multimodal learning analytics and education data mining: Using computational technologies to measure complex learning tasks. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 185-209.
  18. G. Siemens, R.S. Baker, (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK'12) (pp. 252-254). Association for Computing Machinery.
  19. D. Pierre, F. Frank, (2007). Basics of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning. Zeitschrift für Berufs-und Wirtschaftspädagogik, (21), 111- 130.
  20. L. Johnson, S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, A. Freeman, (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium.
  21. Monika Hooda, Chhavi Rana, Omdev Dahiya, Ali Rizwan, Md Shamim Hossain, Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022.
  22. D. Ramesh, S.K. Sanampudi, An automated essay scoring systems: a systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55 (2022) 2495–2527.
  23. S. Lo Piano, Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7, 9 (2020).
  24. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022,
  25. S. Minn, AI-assisted knowledge assessment techniques for adaptive learning environments, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 2022, 100050,
  26. C. Angermueller, T. Parnamaa, L. Parts, O. Stegle, Deep learning for computational biology. Molecular Systems Biology, 12(7), (2016) 878.
  27. B. Ramsundar, P. Eastman, P. Walters, V. Pande, (2019) Deep learning for the life sciences, Applying deep learning to genomics, microscopy, drug discovery, and more. O'Reilly Media.
  28. J.H. Kim, M. Kim, Park, M., & Yoo, J. Immersive interactive technologies and virtual shopping experiences: Differences in consumer perceptions between augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR), Telematics and Informatics, 77 (2023) 101936.
  29. J. Martín-Gutiérrez, P. Fabiani, W. Benesova, M.D. Meneses, C.E. Mora, Augmented Reality to Promote Collaborative and Autonomous Learning in Higher Education. Computers in Human Behavior, 51 (2015) 752-761.
  30. J. Buolamwini, & T. Gebru, Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, (2018) 77-91.
  31. J. Wanner, L.V. Herm, K. Heinrich, Christian Janiesch, The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study. Electron Markets 32, (2022) 2079–2102.
  32. T. Hoel, W. Chen, Privacy and data protection in learning analytics should be motivated by an educational maxim-towards a proposal. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13 (2018) 20.
  33. Potgieter, Isak. 2020. Privacy Concerns in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. The International Review of Information Ethics 28 (June). Edmonton, Canada.
  34. Yu-Ren Lin, Bing Fan, Kui Xie, The influence of a web-based learning environment on low achievers’ science argumentation, Computers & Education, 151 (2020) 103860.
  35. M. Warschauer, M. Knobel, L. Stone, (2004). Technology and Equity in Schooling: Deconstructing the Digital Divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562–588.
  36. A. Al Darayseh, Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers' perspective, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 2023, 100132,
  37. W. Xu, F. Ouyang, The application of AI technologies in STEM education: a systematic review from 2011 to 2021. International Journal of STEM Education, 9 (2022) 59.
  38. Ryan Shaun Baker, Albert T. Corbett, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Angela Z. Wagner, (2004) Off- task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students "game the system". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383–390.
  39. W. Holmes, M. Bialik, C. Fadel, (2016). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  40. R. Kusters, D. Misevic, H. Berry, A. Cully, Y. Le Cunff, L. Dandoy, N. Diaz-Rodríguez, M. Ficher, J. Grizou, A. Othmani, T. Palpanas, M. Komorowski, P. Loiseau, C. Moulin Frier, S. Nanini, D. Quercia, M. Sebag, F. Soulié Fogelman, S. Taleb, L. Tupikina, V. Sahu, J.J. Vie, F. Wehbi (2020) Interdisciplinary Research in Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers in Big Data, 3 (2020).
  41. N. Bostrom, E. Yudkowsky, (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316-334.
  42. Michael Veale, Max Van Kleek, Reuben Binns. (2018) Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 440,1–14.
  43. Kleimola, R., Leppisaari, I. Learning analytics to develop future competences in higher education: a case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19 (2022).
  44. Burrell, Jenna, How the Machine 'Thinks: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms (2015).
  45. J.H. Hoepman, (2014). Privacy Design Strategies. In: Cuppens-Boulahia, N., Cuppens, F., Jajodia, S., Abou El Kalam, A., Sans, T. (eds) ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection. SEC 2014. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 3-642-55415-5_38
  46. Aditi Bhutoria, Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human- In-The-Loop model, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3 (2022) 100068.
  47. C.K.Y. Chan, A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 38 (2023).
  48. A.M. Cox, Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(2021) 3.
  49. Sandra Leaton Gray. Artificial intelligence in schools: Towards a democratic future. London Review of Education. 18(2) (2020) 163-177.
  50. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Artificial Intelligence and Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations, Washington, DC, (2023)



Article Details

Volume 5, Issue 5, Year 2023

Published 2023-08-14


Download data is not yet available.

Plum Analytics