Abstract

This study examines how analogical mapping is used to analyse ọkụkọ proverbs in Ideke lect. The objectives of the study are to analyse the attribute and relational mapping of selected ọkụkọ proverbs in Ideke lect. The data of the study are drawn from ọmaba chant of Ụmụdịaka in Nsukka area of Enugu State, through an audio recording of Ụdara Nwa onyishi (Ọmabe) chant and also the study uses introspection since the researchers are indigenous speakers of the Ideke lect. The research desgn used in this study is a qualitative research paradigm. The study was done descriptively and purposive sampling was used to sample the population. The analogical mapping theory is adopted as the framework for this study. The study finds out that ọkụkọ proverbs in Ideke lect has abstract meanings which contradict the physical (source concepts) image. Another finding of the study proves that in Ideke lect, ọkụkọ as used in this study possess different semantic impulse due to the sociolinguistic environment where such proverbs are being used. These different shades of meanings will be gotten by aligning the physical concept to abstract concept(s). During the analysis of ọkụkọ proverbs in Ideke lect, it is evident that source domain is liable to form various new abstract semantic realisations which was not the initial semantic usage of the linguistic expression. From the semantic purview, proverbs are complex cognitive tasks which links source domain to the target domain.

Keywords

Analogical mapping, Ọkụkọ, Proverb, Ideke, lect,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Aboh, S.C., (2019), A cognitive semantic analysis of Shehu Sani’s poem for the broom, A seminar paper presented in the Department of Linguistics, Igbo and Other Nigerian Languages, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  2. Bundgaard, P.E., (2019), The structure of our concepts: A critical assessment of conceptual metaphor theory as a theory of concepts, Cognitive Semiotics, 12(1). http://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2019-2010
  3. Esfehani, L. S., (2011). The functions of conceptual mappings in the interpretation of Omar Khayyam’s poetry, Journal of Language and Culture, 2 (12), 204-213.
  4. Facounnier, G., (1997), Mapping in thought and language, Cambrridge: Cambridge University Press
  5. Freeman, M., (1998), Poetry and the scope of metaphor: Toward a theory of cognitive poetics, In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads (pp.253-281). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
  6. Gentner, D. & Smith, L., (2012), Analogical reasoning, In V. S. Rama chandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behaviour (2nd Ed.), pp.130-136. Oxford, Uk: Elsevier.
  7. Gentner, D., (1983), Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science, 7 (2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3
  8. Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D.Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind:Advances in the study of language and cognition (pp.195-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  9. Holyoak, K. & Thagard, P., (1995), Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  10. Holyoak, K. J., (2012), Analogy and relational reasoning, In K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234-259).
  11. Johnson, M., (1987), The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Hicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Johnson, M., (1993), Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. Johnson, M., (2005), The philosophy significance of image schemas, In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15-33). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  14. Krisagbedo, E. C. & Agbedo, C. U., (2018), The ‘other room’ metaphor as a linguistic marker of sexism and gender-based violence, A paper presented at 2018 International Conference/Chinua Achebe Memorial Lecture, Faculty of Arts, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 8-13 April.
  15. Lakoff, G. & Johnson. M., (1980), Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Lakoff, G. & tuner, M., (1989)., More than cool reason: a field to poetic metaphor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Lakoff, G., (1987), Women, f ire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Leroy, S., Maillart, C. & Praisse, C., (2014), Analogical mapping across modalities in children with specific language impairment (SLI), Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(9) 2158-2171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.005
  19. Lyons, J., (1968), Introduction to theoretical linguistics, London: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Needham-Didsbury, I., (2016), Interpreting metaphors: Percpectives from pragmatics and psychotherapy, Ph.D Thesis, University College London.
  21. Obitube, K. O., (2017), Theory of analogical mapping, In B. M., Mbah (Ed.), theories of contextual linguistics: Articles in honour of gabriella Ihuarụugo Nwaozuzu (pp. 59-73).
  22. Saeed, J. I. (2003), Semantics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  23. Turner, M. (1987), Death in the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. William, C. & Cruse, D. A., (2004), Cognitive linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.