The German capital city of Berlin, amongst all European cities, is well known as one of the most freethinking center but yet historical. Its industrial historic structures and heritage elements over the spree river shore are reanalyzed and reexamined in this case study with emphasis on club culture and social recreation. The important issue is that, the structures and architectural style of these few surviving buildings have the common features and also diversities which were never brought under light and even ignored to let them became hub for unsocial activities like drug dealing and unhygienic adobes for homeless peoples. To discover and recognize their current contribution and possible social attribute over the whole city fabric, the main construct of this paper is to rethink Berlin’s so called public cohesion on the basis of recreational character and its associated urban order. The research question is: “What is the topmost role played by such built elements for formation of a distinct civic culture and keep Berlin alive?”  To reveal the conceivable theoretical framework of this study will try to accentuate same facts and aspects followed by descriptive-analytical method and suggest independent and dependent variables, possible cooperative urban inventions based on the inhabitants’ interest, protest and demands against privatization of Media Spree. Documentation, field survey, associated drawings, related photographs from different time intervals and model studying was helpful for analyzing the urban morphology. The proposed design will try to indicate that the historic industrial buildings, pubs and markets, art practice and the overall landscape has tremendous bilateral relations for the wellbeing of city dwellers; which could be shaped well into a main ‘Axis’ of cultural activities, which Berlin is not posed with currently.


Collective Memory, Adaptive Reuse, Cultural hub, Urban renewal, Multidisciplinary Strategy,


Metrics Loading ...


  1. Australian International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) Burra Charter Office for Design and Architecture, (2014), Design Guidance Note 1.2.1: Adaptive Reuse. Government of South Australia.
  2. Beccatini, G., (2000), Distretti industriali e sviluppo locale, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
  3. Brooker, G., Stone, S., (2004), Rereadings: Interior architecture and the design principles of remodelling existing buildings, Riba Enterprises, London.
  4. Burchell, R.W., Listokin, D., (1981), The adaptive reuse handbook: procedures to inventory, control, manage, and reemploy surplus municipal properties, Rutgers University, N.J, New Brunswick, Center for Urban Policy Research.
  5. Clark, Justine, (2013), Adaptive Re-use of Industrial Heritage: Opportunities & Challenges, Heritage Council Victoria, Melbourne.
  6. Fusco Girard, L., Nocca, F., Gravagnuolo, A., (2019), Matera: City of nature, city of culture, city of regeneration: Towards a landscape-based and culture-based urban circular economy, Aestimum, 74. https://doi.org/10.13128/aestim-7007
  7. Highfield, D., (1987), The Rehabilitation and Re-Use of Old Buildings, Spon Press, London, UK.
  8. Latham, D., (2000), Creative re-use of buildings, Donhead publishers, Shaftesbury.
  9. Mosler, S. (2015). Heritage politics in Adelaide. University of Adelaide Press ODASA (2014). Design Guidance Note: Adaptive Reuse, Office for Design and Architecture South Australia, Government of South Australia. Last retrieved on 09/11/2016: http://odasa.sa.gov.au/site/wpcontent/uploads/2015/11/1.2.1-Adaptive-Reuse-140725-FV.pdf
  10. Project Outcomes and the Role of Tax Credits. Cleveland State University, 13, 79–108.
  11. Rapoport, A., (1982), The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach, SAGE Publications, New York.
  12. Rio, Vicente del. (2007), From Downtown to the Inner Harbor: Baltimore's Sustainable Revitalization, Part 2: The Inner Harbor Plan (1967 to 2005), Focus 14 Essays, 62-76.
  13. Rubino, G.E., presentazione di A. Venditti, (1978), Archeologia industriale e Mezzogiorno, Giuditta, Rome.
  14. Simons, R.A., Choi, E., (2010), Adaptive Reuse of Religious Buildings in the U.S.: Determinants of Urban Development in the Eu: 50 Projects Supported by the European Regional Development Fund During the 2007-13 Period, (2013), Chapter 3, Smart Growth, Pp 12-13.
  15. Wilson, C., (2010), Adaptive reuse of industrial buildings in Toronto, Ontario: Evaluating criteria for determining building selection.