Abstract

This paper proposes an interprojection model as a unified interface between psychology and Buddhism. The model aims to consolidate some essential concepts in Buddhism, as well as to extend and deepen the modern discipline of psychology. From the perspective of Buddhism, empirical methodology in psychology could be used to instruct about the deeper mysteries of Buddhism, help Buddhist philosophy become more objective and less metaphysical, thus offering an easier access to the general public. From the perspectives of psychology on the other hand, the precepts of Buddhism could help develop a deeper understanding of human experience, thus opening a path for psychology to explore the potential for personal transformation and finding existential meaning. This inter-projection model explains the mirror-like projection between human consciousness and external environment, from which we may obtain fresh insight from points of overlap between Buddhism and psychology. For one example, while Gestalt psychology explores relationships among various environmental stimuli at the given moment, Buddhist spiritual teachings seek to perpetuate the ultimate transcendence through increasing mindfulness on everything in the universe without time constraints. For another, according to Carl Rogers’ client-centered therapy, the therapist is, as suggested by Buddhism, required to foster his own skills on mindfulness other than demonstrating unconditional regard, genuineness, and empathetic understanding to clients, and eventually achieve self-transformation, and feel at ease in various adversities, like lotus growing from dirty muds.

Keywords

Inter-projection mode, Psychoanalysis, Heart Sutra, Diamond Sutra, Insight, nirvana,

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Addison, Ann. "Jung, Vitalism And ‘The Psychoid’: An Historical Reconstruction". Journal Of Analytical Psychology, vol. 54, no. 1, 2009, pp. 123-142., doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.01762.x.
  2. Baumeister, Roy F. et al. "Freudian Defence Mechanisms And Empirical Findings In Modern Social Psychology: Reaction Formation, Projection, Displacement, Undoing, Isolation, Sublimation, And Denial". Journal Of Personality, vol. 66, no. 6, 1998, pp. 1081-1124., doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00043.
  3. Clement, Russell W., and Joachim Krueger. "Liking Persons Versus Liking Groups: A Dual-Process Hypothesis". European Journal Of Social Psychology, vol. 28, no. 3, 1998, pp. 457-469., doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3<457::aid-ejsp880>3.0.co;2-t.
  4. Dramel, Dana. "A Dissonance Theory Approach To Defensive Projection.". The Journal Of Abnormal And Social Psychology, vol. 64, no. 2, 1962, pp. 121-129., doi:10.1037/h0043741.
  5. Henle, Mary. "Robert M. Ogden And Gestalt Psychology In America". Journal Of The History Of The Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, no. 1, 1984, pp. 9-19., doi:10.1002/1520-6696(198401)20:1<9::aid-jhbs2300200103>3.0.co;2-u.
  6. Kudara, Køgi. "A Rough Sketch Of Central Asian Buddhism". Pacific World, vol. 3, no. 4, 2002, pp. 93-107.
  7. Loy, David. "Enlightenment In Buddhism And Advaita Vedanta". International Philosophical Quarterly, vol 22, no. 1, 1982, pp. 65-74. doi:10.5840/ipq19822217.
  8. Malancharuvil, Joseph M. "Projection, Introjection, And Projective Identification: A Reformulation". The American Journal Of Psychoanalysis, vol 64, no. 4, 2004, pp. 375-382., doi:10.1007/s11231-004-4325-y.
  9. Mullen, Brian, and Li-tze Hu. "Social Projection As A Function Of Cognitive Mechanisms: Two Meta-Analytic Integrations". British Journal Of Social Psychology, vol. 27, no. 4, 1988, pp. 333-356., doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1988.tb00836.x.
  10. Newman, Leonard S. et al. "A New Look At Defensive Projection: Thought Suppression, Accessibility, And Biased Person Perception.". Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, vol 72, no. 5, 1997, pp. 980-1001., doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.980.
  11. Orive, Ruben. "Social Projection And Social Comparison Of Opinions.". Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, vol. 54, no. 6, 1988, pp. 953-964., doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.953.
  12. Ross, Lee et al. "The “False Consensus Effect”: An Egocentric Bias In Social Perception And Attribution Processes". Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 13, no. 3, 1977, pp. 279-301., doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x.
  13. Sarao, K. T. S, and Jeffery D Long. Buddhism And Jainism. Springer, 2017.
  14. Semeonoff. B, "Projective Techniques". The Oxford Companion To The Mind, Gregory Richard, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987, p. 646.